Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diphtheria Antitoxin Administration, Outcomes, and Safety: Response to a Diphtheria Outbreak in Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh.
Eisenberg, Nell; Panunzi, Isabella; Wolz, Anja; Burzio, Chiara; Cilliers, Anna; Islam, Md Ariful; Noor, Waqar Mohammad; Jalon, Oren; Jannat-Khah, Deanna; Gil Cuesta, Julita.
Afiliación
  • Eisenberg N; Médecins Sans Frontières, Operational Center Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Panunzi I; Division of Hospital Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
  • Wolz A; Médecins Sans Frontières, Operational Center Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Burzio C; Médecins Sans Frontières, Operational Center Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Cilliers A; Médecins Sans Frontières, Operational Center Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Islam MA; Médecins Sans Frontières, Operational Center Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Noor WM; Médecins Sans Frontières, Operational Center Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Jalon O; Médecins Sans Frontières, Operational Center Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Jannat-Khah D; Médecins Sans Frontières, Operational Center Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Gil Cuesta J; Division of Hospital Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Clin Infect Dis ; 73(7): e1713-e1718, 2021 10 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33245364
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Diphtheria has re-emerged over the past several years. There is a paucity of data on the administration and safety of diphtheria antitoxin (DAT), the standard treatment for diphtheria. The 2017-2018 outbreak among Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh was the largest in decades. We determined the outcomes of DAT-treated patients and describe the occurrence and risk factors associated with adverse reactions to DAT.

METHODS:

We conducted a retrospective study at the Médecins Sans Frontières Rubber Garden Diphtheria Treatment Center from December 2017-September 2018. Diphtheria was diagnosed based on the World Health Organization clinical case criteria. High-acuity patients were eligible for DAT. Safety precautions were meticulously maintained. We calculated the presence of adverse events by age, duration of illness, and DAT dosage using bivariate comparisons.

RESULTS:

We treated 709 patients with DAT; 98% (n = 696) recovered and were discharged. One-fourth (n = 170) had at least 1 adverse reaction. Common reactions included cough (n = 115, 16%), rash (n = 66, 9%), and itching (n = 37, 5%). Three percent (n = 18) had severe hypersensitivity reactions. Five patients died during their DAT infusion or soon afterwards, but no deaths were attributed to DAT.

CONCLUSIONS:

Outcomes for DAT-treated patients were excellent; mortality was <1%. Adverse reactions occurred in one-quarter of all patients, but most reactions were mild and resolved quickly. DAT can be safely administered in a setting with basic critical care, provided there is continuous patient monitoring during the infusion, staff training on management of adverse effects, and attention to safety precautions.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Antitoxina Diftérica / Difteria Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Clin Infect Dis Asunto de la revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Bélgica

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Antitoxina Diftérica / Difteria Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Clin Infect Dis Asunto de la revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Bélgica
...