Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Infectious complications associated with perioperative blood transfusion in partial or radical nephrectomy.
Hamilton, Zachary A; Carbonella, Jeffrey; Siddiqui, Sameer; Al-Hammadi, Noor; Hinyard, Leslie.
Afiliación
  • Hamilton ZA; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Saint Louis University, St Louis, MO. Electronic address: zachary.hamilton@health.slu.edu.
  • Carbonella J; Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
  • Siddiqui S; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Saint Louis University, St Louis, MO.
  • Al-Hammadi N; Advanced Health Data Institute, Department of Health and Clinical Outcomes Research, St Louis, MO.
  • Hinyard L; Advanced Health Data Institute, Department of Health and Clinical Outcomes Research, St Louis, MO.
Urol Oncol ; 39(2): 134.e17-134.e26, 2021 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33250344
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION/

BACKGROUND:

Perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion (PBT) is associated with increased infectious risk for many surgical procedures, although this has not been thoroughly explored for extirpative renal surgery. Underlying mechanisms may be related to an alteration of the patient immune response. We aimed to assess the infectious complications associated with PBT after radical or partial nephrectomy. METHODS/MATERIALS The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (1996-2015) was queried for patients undergoing radical or partial nephrectomy. We assessed rates of infectious complications in patients who did and did not receive PBT. Infections were index complications and included sepsis, abscess, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, and wound infection. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the risk of infectious complications accounting for age, gender, race, insurance, income, surgery type and approach, length of stay, comorbidity, and PBT.

RESULTS:

We identified 140,183 patients undergoing partial or radical nephrectomy during the study period with 17,874 (12.7%) receiving PBT. The rate of PBT was stable throughout the study period (Cochran-Armitage, P= 0.97). Patients receiving PBT compared to those without were relatively older (proportion of age >70, 42.6% vs. 30.5%), non-white (25.4% vs. 21.1%), who underwent radical nephrectomy (84.3% vs. 77.4%), and with longer hospital stay (9.1 vs. 5.1 days; all P< 0.001). On multivariable analysis, PBT was associated with higher odds of any infectious complication (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.5-1.68, P< 0.001). During the study period, the risk of infectious complications was persistently increased in those receiving PBT.

CONCLUSION:

PBT is independently associated with an increased risk of postoperative infections for patients undergoing partial or radical nephrectomy. This may be due to underlying transfusion-related immunomodulatory mechanisms. While PBT is necessary in many instances to promote patient survival, providers should remain cautious when providing PBT after extirpative renal surgery.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones Posoperatorias / Reacción a la Transfusión / Neoplasias Renales / Nefrectomía Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Urol Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS / UROLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones Posoperatorias / Reacción a la Transfusión / Neoplasias Renales / Nefrectomía Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Urol Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS / UROLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article