Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Twice-daily versus once-daily lisinopril and losartan for hypertension: Real-world effectiveness and safety.
Derington, Catherine G; King, Jordan B; Delate, Thomas; Botts, Sheila R; Kroehl, Miranda; Kao, David P; Trinkley, Katy E.
Afiliación
  • Derington CG; Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.
  • King JB; Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.
  • Delate T; Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States of America.
  • Botts SR; University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, CO, United States of America.
  • Kroehl M; Drug Use Management, Kaiser Permanente National Pharmacy, Aurora, CO, United States of America.
  • Kao DP; Department of Pharmacy, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States of America.
  • Trinkley KE; Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, United States of America.
PLoS One ; 15(12): e0243371, 2020.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33270787
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Lisinopril and losartan manufacturer labels recommend twice-daily dosing (BID) if once-daily (QDay) is insufficient to lower blood pressure (BP). METHODS AND

RESULTS:

Retrospective cohort study of patients taking QDay lisinopril and losartan who experienced a dose-doubling (index date). A text-processing tool categorized BID and QDay groups at the index date based on administration instructions. We excluded pregnant/hospice, regimens other than BID/QDay, and without BP measurements -6 months/+12 months of the index date. The most proximal BP measurements -6 months and +2 weeks to 12 months of the index date were used to evaluate BP differences. Propensity scores were generated, and differences in BP and adverse events (angioedema, acute kidney injury, hyperkalemia) between BID/QDay groups were analyzed within dosing cohorts using inverse propensity of treatment-weighted regression models. Of 11,210 and 6,051 patients who met all criteria for lisinopril and losartan, 784 (7.0%) and 453 (7.5%) were taking BID, respectively. BID patients were older and had higher comorbidity and medication burdens. There were no differences in systolic/diastolic BP between BID and QDay, with absolute differences in mean systolic BP ranging from -1.8 to 0.7 mmHg and diastolic BP ranging from -1.1 to 0.1 mmHg (all 95% confidence intervals [CI] cross 0). Lisinopril 10mg BID was associated with an increased odds of angioedema compared to lisinopril 20mg QDay (odds ratio 2.27, 95%CI 1.13-4.58).

CONCLUSIONS:

Adjusted models do not support improved effectiveness or safety of BID lisinopril and losartan.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Lisinopril / Losartán / Hipertensión / Angioedema / Antihipertensivos Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Lisinopril / Losartán / Hipertensión / Angioedema / Antihipertensivos Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
...