Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Selection and validation of a classification system for a child-centred preference-based measure of oral health-related quality of life specific to dental caries.
Rogers, Helen J; Gilchrist, Fiona; Marshman, Zoe; Rodd, Helen D; Rowen, Donna.
Afiliación
  • Rogers HJ; Unit of Oral Health, Dentistry and Society, School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. hrogers1@sheffield.ac.uk.
  • Gilchrist F; Unit of Oral Health, Dentistry and Society, School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
  • Marshman Z; Unit of Oral Health, Dentistry and Society, School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
  • Rodd HD; Unit of Oral Health, Dentistry and Society, School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
  • Rowen D; Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
J Patient Rep Outcomes ; 4(1): 105, 2020 Dec 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33296062
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Caries Impacts and Experiences Questionnaire for Children (CARIES-QC) is a child-centred caries-specific quality of life measure. This study aimed to select, and validate with children, a classification system for a paediatric condition-specific preference-based measure, based on CARIES-QC.

METHODS:

First, a provisional classification system for a preference-based measure based on CARIES-QC was identified using Rasch analysis, psychometric testing, involvement of children and parents, and the developer of CARIES-QC. Second, qualitative, semi-structured 'think aloud' validation interviews were undertaken with a purposive sample of children with dental caries. The interviewer aimed to identify whether items were considered important and easily understood, whether any were overlapping and if any excluded items should be reintroduced. Interview recordings were transcribed verbatim and thematic analysis conducted.

RESULTS:

Rasch analysis identified poor item spread for the items 'cross' and 'school'. Items relating to eating were correlated and the better performing items were considered for selection. Children expressed some confusion regarding the items 'school' and 'food stuck'. Parent representatives thought that impacts surrounding toothbrushing ('brushing') were encompassed by the item 'hurt'. Five items were selected from CARIES-QC for inclusion in the provisional classification system; 'hurt', 'annoy', 'carefully', 'kept awake' and 'cried'. Validation interviews were conducted with 20 children aged 5-16 years old. Participants thought the questionnaire was straightforward and covered a range of impacts. Children thought an item about certain foods being 'hard to eat' was more relevant than one about having to eat more carefully because of their teeth and so the 'carefully' item was replaced with 'hard to eat'.

CONCLUSION:

Following child-centred modification, the preliminary five-item classification system is considered valid and suitable for use in a valuation survey. The innovative child-centred methods used to both identify and validate the classification system can be applied in the development of other preference-based measures.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Aspecto: Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: J Patient Rep Outcomes Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Aspecto: Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: J Patient Rep Outcomes Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido