Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The prognostic significance of anaplasia in childhood rhabdomyosarcoma: A report from the Children's Oncology Group.
Shenoy, Archana; Alvarez, Elysia; Chi, Yueh-Yun; Li, Minjie; Shern, Jack F; Khan, Javed; Hiniker, Susan M; Granberg, Candace F; Hawkins, Douglas S; Parham, David M; Teot, Lisa A; Rudzinski, Erin R.
Afiliación
  • Shenoy A; Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States. Electronic address: shenoy.a@outlook.com.
  • Alvarez E; University of California, Davis, CA, United States.
  • Chi YY; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
  • Li M; University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
  • Shern JF; Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States.
  • Khan J; Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States.
  • Hiniker SM; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.
  • Granberg CF; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
  • Hawkins DS; Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, United States.
  • Parham DM; Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
  • Teot LA; Boston Children's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
  • Rudzinski ER; Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, United States.
Eur J Cancer ; 143: 127-133, 2021 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33302115
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Established prognostic indicators in rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), the most common childhood soft tissue sarcoma, include several clinicopathologic features. Among pathologic features, anaplasia has been suggested as a potential prognostic indicator, but the clinical significance of anaplasia remains unclear.

METHODS:

Patients enrolled on one of five recent Children's Oncology Group clinical trials for RMS (D9602, n = 357; D9802, n = 80; D9803, n = 462; ARST0331, n = 335; and ARST0531, n = 414) with prospective central pathology review were included in this study. Clinicopathologic variables including demographic information, risk group, histologic subtype, and anaplasia were recorded along with overall survival (OS) and failure-free survival (FFS) with failure defined by recurrence, progression, or death. The log-rank test was used to compare OS and FFS.

RESULTS:

Anaplasia was more common in embryonal RMS (27% of all embryonal RMS) than other subtypes of RMS (11% for alveolar RMS, 7% for botryoid RMS, 11% for spindle cell RMS). On multivariate analyses, anaplasia was not an independent prognostic factor in RMS (OShazard ratio (HR) = 1.12, p = 0.43; FFSHR = 1.07, p = 0.56) across all subtypes or within embryonal RMS only (OSHR = 1.41, p = 0.078; FFSHR = 1.25, p = 0.16). Among tumors with TP53 mutations, 69% had anaplasia, while only 24% of tumors with anaplasia had a tumoral TP53 mutation.

CONCLUSIONS:

Anaplasia is not an independent indicator of adverse outcomes in RMS. Emerging information on the prognostic significance of TP53 mutations raises the possibility that anaplasia may be a surrogate marker of TP53 mutations in some cases. Tumoral TP53 mutation status may be investigated as a prognostic indicator in future studies.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Rabdomiosarcoma / Anaplasia Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Cancer Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Rabdomiosarcoma / Anaplasia Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Cancer Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article