Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient-centred care delivered by general practitioners: a qualitative investigation of the experiences and perceptions of patients and providers.
Brickley, Bryce; Williams, Lauren T; Morgan, Mark; Ross, Alyson; Trigger, Kellie; Ball, Lauren.
Afiliación
  • Brickley B; School of Allied Health Sciences, Griffith University Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia bryce.brickley@griffithuni.edu.au.
  • Williams LT; School of Allied Health Sciences, Griffith University Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
  • Morgan M; Faculty of Health Sciences & Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
  • Ross A; General Practice Support, Gold Coast Primary Health Network, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
  • Trigger K; General Practice Support, Gold Coast Primary Health Network, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
  • Ball L; School of Allied Health Sciences, Griffith University Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
BMJ Qual Saf ; 31(3): 191-198, 2022 03.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33303622
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Patient-centred care (PCC) is care that is respectful and responsive to the wishes of patients. The body of literature on PCC delivered by general practitioners (GPs) has increased steadily over time. There is an opportunity to advance the work on GP-delivered PCC through qualitative research involving both patients and providers.

AIM:

To explore the perceptions and experiences of PCC by patient advocates and GPs. DESIGN AND

SETTING:

Qualitative description in a social constructivist paradigm. Participants were sampled from six primary care organisations in south east Queensland/northern New South Wales, Australia.

METHOD:

Purposive sampling was used to recruit English-speaking adult participants who were either practising GPs or patient advocates. Focus group sessions explored participants' perceptions and experiences of PCC. Data were analysed thematically using a constant-comparative approach.

RESULTS:

Three focus groups with 15 patient advocates and three focus groups with 12 practising GPs were conducted before thematic saturation was obtained. Five themes emerged (1) understanding of PCC is varied and personal, (2) valuing humanistic care, (3) considering the system and collaborating in care, (4) optimising the general practice environment and (5) needing support for PCC that is embedded into training.

CONCLUSION:

Patient advocates' and GPs' understanding of PCC are diverse, which can hinder strategies to implement and sustain PCC improvements. Future research should explore novel interventions that expose GPs to unique feedback from patients, assess the patient-centeredness of the environment and promote GP self-reflection on PCC.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Medicina General / Médicos Generales Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Qual Saf Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Medicina General / Médicos Generales Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Qual Saf Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia
...