Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of rapid antigen detection kit from the WHO Emergency Use List for detecting SARS-CoV-2.
Mak, Gannon C K; Lau, Stephen S Y; Wong, Kitty K Y; Chow, Nancy L S; Lau, C S; Lam, Edman T K; Chan, Rickjason C W; Tsang, Dominic N C.
Afiliación
  • Mak GCK; All from Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory Services Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Electronic address: so_phls10@dh.gov.hk.
  • Lau SSY; All from Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory Services Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
  • Wong KKY; All from Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory Services Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
  • Chow NLS; All from Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory Services Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
  • Lau CS; All from Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory Services Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
  • Lam ETK; All from Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory Services Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
  • Chan RCW; All from Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory Services Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
  • Tsang DNC; All from Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory Services Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
J Clin Virol ; 134: 104712, 2021 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33338894
BACKGROUND: Currently, there are two rapid antigen detection (RAD) kits from the WHO Emergency Use List for detecting SARS-CoV-2. OBJECTIVE: The Panbio COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device was selected to evaluate the performance for detecting SARS-CoV-2. STUDY DESIGN: Analytical sensitivity for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus was determined by limit of detection (LOD) using RT-PCR as a reference method. Clinical sensitivity was evaluated by using respiratory specimens collected from confirmed COVID-19 patients. RESULTS: The LOD results showed that the RAD kit was 100 fold less sensitive than RT-PCR. Clinical sensitivity of the RAD kit was 68.6 % for detecting specimens from COVID-19 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The RAD kit evaluated in the present study shared similar performance with another kit from the WHO Emergency Use List, the Standard Q COVID-19 Ag. Understanding the clinical characteristics of RAD kits can guide us to decide different testing strategies in different settings.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Juego de Reactivos para Diagnóstico / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 / Antígenos Virales Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Virol Asunto de la revista: VIROLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Juego de Reactivos para Diagnóstico / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 / Antígenos Virales Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Virol Asunto de la revista: VIROLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Países Bajos