Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Radiation-associated angiosarcoma of the breast: analysis of diagnostic tools in a registry-based population.
Salminen, Samuli Henri; Sampo, Mika M; Böhling, Tom O; Salo, Juho; Tarkkanen, Maija; Blomqvist, Carl P; Hukkinen, Katja.
Afiliación
  • Salminen SH; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital (HUH) and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Sampo MM; Department of Pathology, HUSLAB Helsinki University Hospital (HUH) and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Böhling TO; Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Salo J; Department of Plastic Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital (HUH) and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Tarkkanen M; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital (HUH) and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Blomqvist CP; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital (HUH) and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Hukkinen K; Department of Oncology, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden.
Acta Radiol ; 63(1): 22-27, 2022 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33349000
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Radiation-associated angiosarcoma of the breast (RAASB) is a serious late consequence caused by breast cancer treatment. Initial symptoms are often inconspicuous, thus contributing to diagnostic delay. Most previous studies of the diagnostic aspects of RAASB are case reports.

PURPOSE:

To perform a complete review of the imaging findings and biopsy methods in a nationwide RAASB cohort. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

RAASB patients were identified from a national cancer registry and additional patients were included from our hospital. All available information from imaging (mammogram [MGR], ultrasound [US], magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], and computed tomography [CT]) and biopsies was reviewed. The sensitivity of imaging and biopsy methods for detection of RAASB was calculated.

RESULTS:

Fifty-eight patients with RAASB were found. Fourteen MGR, 30 US, 24 MRI, and 25 CT studies were available for evaluation. The sensitivity of MGR, US, MRI, and CT for detection of RAASB was 43%, 50%, 92%, and 84%, respectively. Superior sensitivity was demonstrated for punch biopsy (84%) and incisional biopsy (93%) compared to fine-needle aspiration cytology (0%) and core needle biopsy (18%).

CONCLUSION:

MRI and CT have comparable sensitivity for detection of RAASB, while MGR and US are unreliable. However, negative findings in MRI or CT must be interpreted with caution. Punch biopsy and incisional biopsy are the preferred biopsy methods.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Hemangiosarcoma / Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Acta Radiol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Finlandia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Hemangiosarcoma / Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Acta Radiol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Finlandia
...