Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Navigated TMS in the ICU: Introducing Motor Mapping to the Critical Care Setting.
Schramm, Severin; Haddad, Alexander F; Chyall, Lawrence; Krieg, Sandro M; Sollmann, Nico; Tarapore, Phiroz E.
Afiliación
  • Schramm S; Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany.
  • Haddad AF; Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco, 1001 Potrero Ave, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA.
  • Chyall L; Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco, 1001 Potrero Ave, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA.
  • Krieg SM; Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany.
  • Sollmann N; TUM-Neuroimaging Center, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, 81675 Munich, Germany.
  • Tarapore PE; TUM-Neuroimaging Center, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, 81675 Munich, Germany.
Brain Sci ; 10(12)2020 Dec 18.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33352857
ABSTRACT
Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) is a modality for noninvasive cortical mapping. Specifically, nTMS motor mapping is an objective measure of motor function, offering quantitative diagnostic information regardless of subject cooperation or consciousness. Thus far, it has mostly been restricted to the outpatient setting. This study evaluates the feasibility of nTMS motor mapping in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting and solves the challenges encountered in this special environment. We compared neuronavigation based on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We performed motor mappings in neurocritical patients under varying conditions (e.g., sedation or hemicraniectomy). Furthermore, we identified ways of minimizing electromyography (EMG) noise in the interference-rich ICU environment. Motor mapping was performed in 21 patients (six females, median age 69 years). In 18 patients, motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were obtained. In three patients, MEPs could not be evoked. No adverse reactions occurred. We found CT to offer a comparable neuronavigation to MRI (CT maximum e-field 52 ± 14 V/m vs. MRI maximum e-field 52 ± 11 V/m; p = 0.6574). We detailed EMG noise reduction methods and found that propofol sedation of up to 80 mcg/kg/h did not inhibit MEPs. Yet, nTMS equipment interfered with exposed pulse oximetry. nTMS motor mapping application and use was illustrated in three clinical cases. In conclusion, we present an approach for the safe and reliable use of nTMS motor mapping in the ICU setting and outline possible benefits. Our findings support further studies regarding the clinical value of nTMS in critical care settings.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Brain Sci Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Brain Sci Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania