Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of Antegrade Intramedullary Compression Screw Fixation of Metacarpal Shaft Fractures in a Cadaver Model.
Hoang, Don; Vu, Catphuong L; Huang, Jerry I.
Afiliación
  • Hoang D; Department of Hand, Upper Extremity, and Microsurgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San, Jose, CA. Electronic address: dhoang@alumni.stanford.edu.
  • Vu CL; Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA.
  • Huang JI; Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA.
J Hand Surg Am ; 46(5): 428.e1-428.e7, 2021 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33358079
PURPOSE: Surgical options for displaced metacarpal shaft fractures include the use of Kirschner wires, plates and screws, and most recently, intramedullary headless compression screws (IMHCS), which have been reported using only retrograde insertion through the metacarpal head. We evaluated IMHCS fixation of metacarpal shaft fractures through an antegrade approach in a cadaver model. METHODS: We performed antegrade placement of IMHCS in 10 cadaver hands including all 5 digits (total of 50). Displaced transverse proximal metacarpal shaft fractures were created and reduced with a retrograde guidewire from the metacarpal head across the shaft fracture and exiting the metacarpal base. This was retrieved through a 6-mm dorsal wrist incision and overdrilled before the placement of a 4.1-mm-diameter IMHCS in the ring finger and a 4.7-mm screw in all other metacarpals. After IMHCS placement, carpometacarpal (CMC) joint violation was measured along with the optimal starting point for the guidewire on the metacarpal head relative to the dorsal cortex. RESULTS: In all 50 metacarpals, we achieved successful fracture reduction and fixation without violating the extensor mechanism at the wrist. Our retrograde guidewire entry point through the metacarpal head ranged from 4.2 to 4.7 mm volar to the dorsal cortex. The actual area of CMC joint violated by IMHCS placement was largest in the index CMC joint (4.9%), followed by the middle (3.7%), little (2.9%), ring (0.5%), and thumb joints (0.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Placement of IMHCS through an antegrade approach from the CMC joint can be performed effectively for all transverse metacarpal fractures, including the thumb, using a limited incision. There is minimal violation of the articular surfaces of the trapezium, capitate, and hamate for the thumb, middle, ring, and little metacarpals. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Antegrade IMHCS fixation successfully avoids the potential morbidity of creating a metacarpal head articular surface or extensor mechanism defect at the metacarpophalangeal joint seen with the retrograde approaches.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Huesos del Metacarpo / Fracturas Óseas / Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Hand Surg Am Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Huesos del Metacarpo / Fracturas Óseas / Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Hand Surg Am Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos