Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
How old is old for implant therapy in terms of implant survival and marginal bone levels after 5-11 years?
Etöz, Onur; Bertl, Kristina; Kukla, Edmund; Ulm, Christian; Ozmeric, Nurdan; Stavropoulos, Andreas.
Afiliación
  • Etöz O; Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Odontology, University of Malmö, Malmö, Sweden.
  • Bertl K; Department of Periodontology, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Kukla E; Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Odontology, University of Malmö, Malmö, Sweden.
  • Ulm C; Division of Oral Surgery, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Ozmeric N; Comprehensive Center Unit, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Stavropoulos A; Division of Oral Surgery, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 32(3): 337-348, 2021 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33368735
ABSTRACT

AIM:

To evaluate implant survival and marginal bone levels (MBLevel ) at least 5 years after implant installation in patients ≥65 years old.

METHODS:

Patient records were screened retrospectively for the following inclusion criteria (1) ≥65 years of age at the time of implant installation, and (2) ≥5-year radiographic follow-up or registered implant loss. Association between patient- and implant-related data with radiographically assessed data [i.e. implant survival, mean MBLevel (i.e. average of mesial and distal level) and maximum marginal bone loss (i.e. either mesial or distal loss; maximum MBLoss )] were statistically evaluated by mixed effects multi-level regression models.

RESULTS:

Two-hundred-eighteen implants in 74 patients were included with a mean follow-up of 6.2 years (range 5 to 10.7 years); four early and six late implant losses have been registered (implant survival rate 95.4%). Mean MBLevel and maximum MBLoss was 1.24 ± 0.9 mm and 1.48 ± 1.0 mm, respectively. Maximum MBLoss  < 2 mm, 2 to 5 mm and ≥5 mm was found in 70.7, 28.8 and 0.5% of the implants, respectively. For both, mean MBLevel and maximum MBLoss , age presented a slightly protective effect (mean MBLevel Coef. -0.041, p = .016; maximum MBLoss Coef. -0.045, p = .014).

CONCLUSION:

The high implant survival rate (95.4%), low mean MBLevel (1.24 mm) and low frequency of maximum MBLoss  ≥ 5 mm (0.5%) observed herein after 5 to 11 years follow-up suggest that older age should not be considered as a limiting factor for implant treatment.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Implantes Dentales / Pérdida de Hueso Alveolar Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Oral Implants Res Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suecia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Implantes Dentales / Pérdida de Hueso Alveolar Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Oral Implants Res Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suecia