Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Card pull effects of the Thematic Apperception Test using the Social Cognition and Object Relations-Global Rating Method on complex psychiatric sample.
Ridenour, Jeremy M; Lewis, Katie C; Siefert, Caleb J; Pitman, Seth R; Knauss, Daniel; Stein, Michelle B.
Afiliación
  • Ridenour JM; Erikson Institute for Education and Research, Austen Riggs Center, Stockbridge, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Lewis KC; Erikson Institute for Education and Research, Austen Riggs Center, Stockbridge, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Siefert CJ; Department of Behavioral Sciences, University of Michigan-Dearborn, Dearborn, Michigan, USA.
  • Pitman SR; Erikson Institute for Education and Research, Austen Riggs Center, Stockbridge, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Knauss D; Erikson Institute for Education and Research, Austen Riggs Center, Stockbridge, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Stein MB; Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Clin Psychol Psychother ; 28(5): 1079-1090, 2021 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33416193
In recent years, there has been growing interest in examining the stimulus pull effects on respondent narratives to the Thematic Apperception Test (Murray, 1943) using standardized coding methods such as the Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale-Global Rating Method (SCORS-G; Stein, Hilsenroth, Slavin-Mulford, & Pinsker, 2011; Westen, 1995). The present study expands on prior work by examining sources of variance in SCORS-G dimensions and card pull effect patterns in an adult clinical sample characterized by high psychiatric comorbidity and clinical severity. A sample of 158 adult psychiatric patients in long-term residential treatment provided narratives to 10 TAT cards (five of which have not previously been studied for pull effects). Cards 2 and 7BM pulled for significantly more adaptive narratives (positive pull), whereas Card 13MF pulled for more pathological stories (negative pull). Like prior studies, variance in cognitive dimensions of the SCORS-G was most explained by person effects, whereas the largest source of variance for all other dimensions was best explained by a combination of the card and the person effects on the narrative. Finally, exploratory analyses of card pull effects within different gender groups were conducted. The implications of these findings for performance-based future studies and possible clinical applications of card pull findings are discussed.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Prueba de Apercepción Temática / Apego a Objetos Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Psychol Psychother Asunto de la revista: PSICOLOGIA / PSIQUIATRIA / TERAPEUTICA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Prueba de Apercepción Temática / Apego a Objetos Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Psychol Psychother Asunto de la revista: PSICOLOGIA / PSIQUIATRIA / TERAPEUTICA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido