Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Psychologically informed physical therapy for musculoskeletal pain: current approaches, implications, and future directions from recent randomized trials.
Coronado, Rogelio A; Brintz, Carrie E; McKernan, Lindsey C; Master, Hiral; Motzny, Nicole; Silva, Flavio M; Goyal, Parul M; Wegener, Stephen T; Archer, Kristin R.
Afiliación
  • Coronado RA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Brintz CE; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • McKernan LC; Vanderbilt Center for Musculoskeletal Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Master H; Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Motzny N; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Silva FM; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Goyal PM; Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Wegener ST; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Archer KR; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Pain Rep ; 5(5): e847, 2020.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33490842
ABSTRACT
Psychologically informed physical therapy (PIPT) blends psychological strategies within a physical therapist's treatment approach for the prevention and management of chronic musculoskeletal pain. Several randomized trials have been conducted examining the efficacy of PIPT compared to standard physical therapy on important patient-reported outcomes of disability, physical function, and pain. In this review, we examine recent trials published since 2012 to describe current PIPT methods, discuss implications from findings, and offer future directions. Twenty-two studies, representing 18 trials, were identified. The studied PIPT interventions included (1) graded activity or graded exposure (n = 6), (2) cognitive-behavioral-based physical therapy (n = 9), (3) acceptance and commitment-based physical therapy (n = 1), and (4) internet-based psychological programs with physical therapy (n = 2). Consistent with prior reviews, graded activity is not superior to other forms of physical activity or exercise. In a few recent studies, cognitive-behavioral-based physical therapy had short-term efficacy when compared to a program of standardized exercise. There is a need to further examine approaches integrating alternative strategies including acceptance-based therapies (ie, acceptance and commitment therapy or mindfulness) or internet-based cognitive-behavioral programs within physical therapy. Although PIPT remains a promising care model, more convincing evidence is needed to support widespread adoption, especially in light of training demands and implementation challenges.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: Pain Rep Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: Pain Rep Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos