Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
LACE Score-Based Risk Management Tool for Long-Term Home Care Patients: A Proof-of-Concept Study in Taiwan.
Su, Mei-Chin; Chen, Yu-Chun; Huang, Mei-Shu; Lin, Yen-Hsi; Lin, Li-Hwa; Chang, Hsiao-Ting; Chen, Tzeng-Ji.
Afiliación
  • Su MC; Department of Nursing, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 112, Taiwan.
  • Chen YC; Institute of Hospital and Health Care Administration, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan.
  • Huang MS; Institute of Hospital and Health Care Administration, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan.
  • Lin YH; Department of Family Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 112, Taiwan.
  • Lin LH; School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan.
  • Chang HT; Department of Nursing, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 112, Taiwan.
  • Chen TJ; Department of Family Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 112, Taiwan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33525331
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Effectively predicting and reducing readmission in long-term home care (LTHC) is challenging. We proposed, validated, and evaluated a risk management tool that stratifies LTHC patients by LACE predictive score for readmission risk, which can further help home care providers intervene with individualized preventive plans.

METHOD:

A before-and-after study was conducted by a LTHC unit in Taiwan. Patients with acute hospitalization within 30 days after discharge in the unit were enrolled as two cohorts (Pre-Implement cohort in 2017 and Post-Implement cohort in 2019). LACE score performance was evaluated by calibration and discrimination (AUC, area under receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve). The clinical utility was evaluated by negative predictive value (NPV).

RESULTS:

There were 48 patients with 87 acute hospitalizations in Pre-Implement cohort, and 132 patients with 179 hospitalizations in Post-Implement cohort. These LTHC patients were of older age, mostly intubated, and had more comorbidities. There was a significant reduction in readmission rate by 44.7% (readmission rate 25.3% vs. 14.0% in both cohorts). Although LACE score predictive model still has room for improvement (AUC = 0.598), it showed the potential as a useful screening tool (NPV, 87.9%; 95% C.I., 74.2-94.8). The reduction effect is more pronounced in infection-related readmission.

CONCLUSION:

As real-world evidence, LACE score-based risk management tool significantly reduced readmission by 44.7% in this LTHC unit. Larger scale studies involving multiple homecare units are needed to assess the generalizability of this study.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Readmisión del Paciente / Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Humans País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Int J Environ Res Public Health Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Taiwán

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Readmisión del Paciente / Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Humans País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Int J Environ Res Public Health Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Taiwán