Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral sitafloxacin versus moxifloxacin in adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia.
Li, Ying; Zhu, Demei; Peng, Yiqiang; Tong, Zhaohui; Ma, Zhuang; Xu, Jinfu; Sun, Shenghua; Tang, Huaping; Xiu, Qingyu; Liang, Yongjie; Wang, Xiongbiao; Lv, Xiaoju; Dai, Yuanrong; Zhu, Yingqun; Qu, Yuejin; Xu, Kaifeng; Huang, Yijiang; Wu, Shiman; Lai, Guoxiang; Li, Xi; Han, Xiaowen; Yang, Zegang; Sheng, Jifang; Liu, Zhuola; Li, Hui; Chen, Yiqiang; Zhu, Huili; Zhang, Yingyuan.
Afiliación
  • Li Y; Institute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
  • Zhu D; Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics, National Health and Family Planning Commission, Shanghai, China.
  • Peng Y; Institute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
  • Tong Z; Changsha Central Hospital, Changsha, China.
  • Ma Z; Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  • Xu J; General Hospital of Northern Theater Command of the People's Liberation Army (PLA), Shenyang, China.
  • Sun S; Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China.
  • Tang H; The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
  • Xiu Q; Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao, China.
  • Liang Y; Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Shanghai, China.
  • Wang X; Shanghai East Hospital, Shanghai, China.
  • Lv X; Putuo District Central Hospital, Shanghai, China.
  • Dai Y; West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Zhu Y; The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
  • Qu Y; The Third Hospital of Changsha, Changsha, China.
  • Xu K; The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
  • Huang Y; Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Wu S; Hainan Provincial People's Hospital, Haikou, China.
  • Lai G; The First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
  • Li X; No. 900 Hospital, Joint Logistics Support Force of PLA, Fuzhou, China.
  • Han X; The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical College, Haikou, China.
  • Yang Z; Hebei Provincial People's Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China.
  • Sheng J; Changde First People's Hospital, Changde, China.
  • Liu Z; The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
  • Li H; The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
  • Chen Y; Jilin Provincial People's Hospital, Changchun, China.
  • Zhu H; The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
  • Zhang Y; Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 37(4): 693-701, 2021 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33534617
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral sitafloxacin versus oral moxifloxacin in the treatment of Chinese adults with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

This is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, positive-controlled clinical trial (chinadrugtrials.org.cn identifier CTR20130046). CAP patients received sitafloxacin tablets 100 mg once daily (qd) or 100 mg twice daily (bid) to compare with moxifloxacin tablets 400 mg qd, for 7-10 days. The primary outcome was non-inferiority of sitafloxacin to moxifloxacin in clinical cure rate at test of cure (TOC) visit in per-protocol set (PPS).

RESULTS:

A total of 343 patients were randomized (sitafloxacin 100 mg qd, n = 117; sitafloxacin 100 mg bid, n = 116; moxifloxacin, n = 110), 291 patients were included in the PPS (sitafloxacin 100 mg qd, n = 96; sitafloxacin 100 mg bid, n = 94; moxifloxacin, n = 101). The clinical cure rate was 94.8% in the sitafloxacin 100 mg qd group, 96.8% in the sitafloxacin 100 mg bid group and 95.0% in the moxifloxacin group. At the TOC visit, the microbiological success rate was 97.0% (32/33) in the sitafloxacin 100 mg qd group, 97.1% (34/35) in the sitafloxacin 100 mg bid group and 94.9% (37/39) in the moxifloxacin group in the microbiological evaluable set (MES). The incidence of study-drug-related adverse events (AEs) was 23.3% (27/116) in the sitafloxacin 100 mg qd group, 29.8% (34/114) in the sitafloxacin 100 mg bid group and 28.2% (31/110) in the moxifloxacin group (p > .05). The common AEs related to study drug were dizziness, nausea, diarrhea, increased platelet count and alanine transaminase (ALT) elevation. All the AEs resolved completely after discontinuation of study drug.

CONCLUSION:

Sitafloxacin 100 mg qd or 100 mg bid for 7-10 days is not inferior to moxifloxacin 400 mg qd for 7-10 days in clinical efficacy for adult CAP patients. Sitafloxacin provides a safety profile comparable to moxifloxacin.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neumonía / Antibacterianos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Curr Med Res Opin Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neumonía / Antibacterianos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Curr Med Res Opin Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China