Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical outcomes and uroflowmetry assessment in patients with apical prolapse after laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension.
Ma, Yidi; Zhang, Ye; Ma, Congcong; Wang, Yuan; Tian, Weijie; Zhu, Lan.
Afiliación
  • Ma Y; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
  • Zhang Y; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
  • Ma C; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
  • Wang Y; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
  • Tian W; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
  • Zhu L; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China. Electronic address: zhu_julie@vip.sina.com.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 259: 12-17, 2021 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33550106
OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate the voiding function and voiding dysfunction 3 months after laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension (LUSLS). We identified risk factors for postoperative voiding dysfunction. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective study included 57 women with apical prolapse who underwent LUSLS with stage II or greater apical prolapse and without advanced anterior vaginal prolapse (stage III or IV). Data were collected from electronic medical records. Voiding function was assessed by uroflowmetry, PVR examination, and self-report questionnaires (the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 and the Urinary Impact Questionnaire) at baseline and 3 months after surgery. Voiding dysfunction was defined as an average flow rate (Qave)<10 ml/s, a maximum flow rate (Qmax)<15 ml/s, or a postvoid residual volume (PVR)>50 ml. Statistical analyses were performed using paired-sample t tests, χ2 tests, and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Thirty-five percent of women suffered from voiding dysfunction preoperatively. Uroflowmetry parameters and PVR, objective symptoms including voiding difficulties, incomplete empty, frequency and urinary incontinence didn't show significant improvement postoperatively (all p>0.05). Low Qave was identified as an independent risk factor of post voiding dysfunction (odds ratio, 0.558; 95 % CI, 0.324-0.963). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one-third of women suffering from apical prolapse without advanced anterior vaginal wall had evidence of voiding dysfunction preoperatively. LUSLS has no obvious effect on uroflowmetry parameters and clinical symptoms.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Prolapso Uterino / Laparoscopía / Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China Pais de publicación: Irlanda

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Prolapso Uterino / Laparoscopía / Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China Pais de publicación: Irlanda