Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Long-term outcomes of patients undergoing coronary sinus reducer implantation - A multicenter study.
Konigstein, Maayan; Ponticelli, Francesco; Zivelonghi, Carlo; Merdler, Ilan; Revivo, Miri; Verheye, Stefan; Giannini, Francesco; Banai, Shmuel.
Afiliación
  • Konigstein M; Tel Aviv Medical Center and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel.
  • Ponticelli F; Cardiovascular Center, Interventional Cardiology Unit, GVM Care & Research Maria Cecilia Hospital Cotignola, Italy.
  • Zivelonghi C; Division of Heart Center, ZNA Middelheim Hospital, Lindendreef Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Merdler I; Tel Aviv Medical Center and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel.
  • Revivo M; Tel Aviv Medical Center and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel.
  • Verheye S; Division of Heart Center, ZNA Middelheim Hospital, Lindendreef Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Giannini F; Cardiovascular Center, Interventional Cardiology Unit, GVM Care & Research Maria Cecilia Hospital Cotignola, Italy.
  • Banai S; Tel Aviv Medical Center and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel.
Clin Cardiol ; 44(3): 424-428, 2021 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33605473
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Coronary sinus (CS) narrowing by reducer implantation has emerged as a safe and effective therapy for patients suffering from refractory angina. However, data regarding the clinical benefit of this treatment over time is lacking.

METHODS:

Patients undergoing successful reducer implantation were enrolled prospectively to clinical registries at three medical centers. Those with more than 2-years of follow-up were included in the present analysis. Peri-procedural data, data regarding adverse events, and current evaluation of angina severity (Canadian Cardiovascular Society [CCS] class) were collected.

RESULTS:

Overall, 99 consecutive patients (77% males, mean age 69.8 ± 9.4) with severe angina were enrolled between September 2010 and October 2017 and included in the present analysis. No procedure-related complications were recorded. During a median follow up time of 3.38 years (IQR 2.95-4.40), 15.1% of the patients died, 9% experienced myocardial infarction (MI) and 21% underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Mean CCS class was 3.1 ± 0.5 at baseline, improved to 1.66 ± 0.8 at 1 year (p < .001), and remained low through 2-years and at last follow up (1.72 ± 0.8 and 1.71 ± 0.8, p > 0.5 for both, in comparison to 1 year). At baseline 91% of patients reported severe disabling angina (CCS class 3-4), at 1 year only 17.9% suffered from disabling angina, p < .001, and this portion remained low overtime (19% at last follow up).

CONCLUSION:

Long-term mortality of patients undergoing reducer implantation is similar to that reported for patients with stable coronary artery disease. The previously reported short-term efficacy of the reducer, reflected by significant improvement of angina symptoms, is maintained over time.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Seno Coronario / Intervención Coronaria Percutánea Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Clin Cardiol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Israel

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Seno Coronario / Intervención Coronaria Percutánea Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Clin Cardiol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Israel
...