Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Measurement of Tryptase and CC16/Albumin in Nasal Lavage Fluid as a Screening Tool of Allergic Rhinitis.
Kwon, Oh Eun; Lee, Young Chan; Park, Jung Min; Kim, Sung Wan; Eun, Young-Gyu; Ko, Seong-Gyu.
Afiliación
  • Kwon OE; Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee YC; Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Park JM; Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim SW; Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Eun YG; Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Ko SG; Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.
Am J Rhinol Allergy ; 35(6): 768-773, 2021 Nov.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33631947
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

There is no trial to make a diagnostic tool of allergic rhinitis (AR) utilizing biomarkers from nasal fluid. Base on previous studies, we selected following five biomarkers in nasal fluids that represent the characteristics of allergic reactions tryptase, eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), interleukin 5 (IL-5), Clara cell protein 16 (CC16) and CC16-to-albumin ratio.

OBJECTIVE:

This study aimed to identify biomarkers in nasal discharge that may be used in biosensors to diagnose AR as an additional diagnostic tool.

METHODS:

Patients showed rhinorrhea and tested positive on allergic skin and specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) tests were included in the AR group. The non-AR group included individuals no dominant nasal symptoms and tested negative on allergy tests. Nasal lavage fluid samples were collected from all participants. Biomarkers in the samples were quantified using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS:

Forty-five patients with AR and 28 non-AR subjects were enrolled in this study. Comparing the concentrations of biomarkers, the concentrations of tryptase and IL-5 were significantly higher in the AR group than in the NAR group. And CC16 level and CC16-to-albumin ratio were significantly lower in the AR group. In the combination of tryptase or CC16-to-albumin ratio, the sensitivity was 90.7% and the specificity was 64.3% (p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION:

The combination of "tryptase or CC16-to-albumin" could be used as a screening tool for AR. Although this diagnostic method could not replace conventional diagnostic tools, we could consider the method we proposed as an additional screening tool for patients who could not undergo allergy tests.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Uteroglobina / Triptasas / Rinitis Alérgica Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Am J Rhinol Allergy Asunto de la revista: ALERGIA E IMUNOLOGIA / OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Uteroglobina / Triptasas / Rinitis Alérgica Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Am J Rhinol Allergy Asunto de la revista: ALERGIA E IMUNOLOGIA / OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article