Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Surveillance of foodborne parasitic diseases in Europe in a One Health approach.
van der Giessen, Joke; Deksne, Gunita; Gómez-Morales, Maria Angeles; Troell, Karin; Gomes, Jacinto; Sotiraki, Smaragda; Rozycki, Miroslaw; Kucsera, István; Djurkovic-Djakovic, Olgica; Robertson, Lucy J.
Afiliación
  • van der Giessen J; National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, 3721 MA Bilthoven, P.O. Box 1, Bilthoven 3720 BA, Netherlands.
  • Deksne G; Institute of Food Safety, Animal Health and Environment "BIOR", Lejupes Str. 3, Riga LV-1076, Latvia.
  • Gómez-Morales MA; Faculty of Biology, University of Latvia, Jelgavas Str. 1, Riga LV-1004, Latvia.
  • Troell K; European Union Reference Laboratory for Parasites, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena, 299, Rome 00161, Italy.
  • Gomes J; National Veterinary Institute, Ulls väg 2B, Uppsala SE-751 89, Sweden.
  • Sotiraki S; National Institute for Agrarian and Veterinary Research, Av. da República, Quinta do Marquês, Oeiras 2780-157, Portugal.
  • Rozycki M; Veterinary Research Institute, Hellenic Agricultural Organisation-Demeter, Thermi, Thessaloniki 57001, Greece.
  • Kucsera I; National Veterinary Research Institute, Aleja Partyzantów 57, Pulawy 24-100, Poland.
  • Djurkovic-Djakovic O; National Public Health Center, Albert Flórián út 2-6, Budapest 1097, Hungary.
  • Robertson LJ; Centre of Excellence for Food- and Vector-borne Zoonoses, Institute for Medical Research, University of Belgrade, Dr. Subotica 4, Belgrade 11129, Serbia.
Parasite Epidemiol Control ; 13: e00205, 2021 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33665388
ABSTRACT
In 2012, WHO/FAO ranked 24 foodborne parasites (FBP) using multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) to provide risk assessors with a basis for prioritising control of highly ranked FBP on the global level. One conclusion was that ranking may differ substantially per region. In Europe, the same methodology was used to rank FBP of relevance for Europe. Of the 24 FBP, the top-five prioritised FBP were identified for Europe as Echinococcus multilocularis, Toxoplasma gondii, Trichinella spiralis, E. granulosus, and Cryptosporidium spp., all of which are zoonotic. The objective of the present study was to provide an overview of surveillance and reporting systems in Europe for these top five prioritised FBP in the human and animal populations, to identify gaps, and give recommendations for improvement. Information on the surveillance systems was collected from 35 European countries and analysed according to the five different regions. For most FBP, human surveillance is passive in most countries and regions in Europe and notification differs between countries and regions. Adequate surveillance programmes for these FBP are lacking, except for T. spiralis, which is notifiable in 34 countries with active surveillance in susceptible animals under EU directive. Although human and animal surveillance data are available for the five prioritised FBP, we identified a lack of consistency in surveillance and reporting requirements between national experts and European bodies. Recommendations for improved surveillance systems are discussed.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Screening_studies Idioma: En Revista: Parasite Epidemiol Control Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Screening_studies Idioma: En Revista: Parasite Epidemiol Control Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos