Comparison of Flowmetric Plethysmography and Forced Oscillatory Mechanics to Measure Airway Hyperresponsiveness in Horses.
Front Vet Sci
; 7: 511023, 2020.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-33693040
ABSTRACT
Airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) is linked to airway inflammation and is considered a key manifestation of mild/moderate equine asthma (EA). The study purpose was to determine whether two modalities of non-invasive lung function testing (FOM-forced oscillatory mechanics vs. FP-flowmetric plethysmography) establish the same clinical diagnosis of AHR in horses, using histamine bronchoprovocation. Nineteen horses (3-25 years, 335-650 kg) with clinical signs suggestive of mild/moderate equine asthma were enrolled. FOM and FP testing was performed in each horse on two consecutive days, using a randomized cross-over design. AHR was defined by the histamine dose needed to double FOM baseline resistance, or to achieve a 35% increase in FP delta flow. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was subsequently collected and stained with modified Wright's and toluidine blue stains. Binary statistical tests (related samples T-test, Mann-Whitney U, Chi-square analyses) were performed to compare study groups, with P < 0.05 considered significant. Abnormal BALF cytology confirmed EA in 14/19 (73.7%) horses. Both FOM and FP revealed AHR in 7/14 (50%) of these EA horses. An additional 4/19 (21.1%) horses showed AHR based on FP but not FOM, including two horses with normal BALF cytology. A diagnosis of AHR was more often associated with FP than FOM (P = 0.013), although the prevalence of AHR was significantly higher in EA vs. non-EA horses, regardless of testing methodology. The phase angle between thoracic and abdominal components of breathing did not differ between test groups. In conclusion, FP diagnosed AHR more frequently than did FOM, including horses with no other diagnostic evidence of EA. Without further evaluation, these two testing modalities of AHR cannot be used interchangeably.
Texto completo:
1
Colección:
01-internacional
Base de datos:
MEDLINE
Tipo de estudio:
Clinical_trials
/
Risk_factors_studies
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Front Vet Sci
Año:
2020
Tipo del documento:
Article
País de afiliación:
Estados Unidos