Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Greenlight laser photoselective vaporization vs open simple prostatectomy: long-term functional outcomes after treatment of large volume prostates (> 80 cc).
Laine-Caroff, Paul; Pradere, Benjamin; Ruffion, Alain; Bruyere, Franck.
Afiliación
  • Laine-Caroff P; Department of Urology, CHRU de Tours, Loire Valley, 2, Boulevard Tonnelle, 37044, Tours cedex 9, France. paul_laine@live.fr.
  • Pradere B; Department of Urology, CHRU de Tours, Loire Valley, 2, Boulevard Tonnelle, 37044, Tours cedex 9, France.
  • Ruffion A; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Bruyere F; Department of Urology, GH Lyon-Sud, hospices civils de Lyon, Claude-Bernard Université Lyon-1, 69495, Pierre-Bénite cedex, France.
Int Urol Nephrol ; 53(7): 1289-1295, 2021 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33725292
PURPOSE: To compare long-term outcomes between photoselective vaporization (PVP) and Open simple prostatectomy (OSP) for prostates > 80 cc. METHODS: Men operated either by PVP or OSP for BPH > 80 cc were included in two expert centres. Functional and uroflowmetric outcomes were assessed pre- and postoperatively. Data were collected prospectively in the PVP group and retrospectively in the OSP group and compared at long-term follow-up. Complications and re-intervention rates were used as main outcomes. RESULTS: 332 men underwent surgery: 132 PVP were performed in a fist expert-centre and 200 OSP were performed in a second one with a median follow-up of 54 and 48 months, respectively. Mean Prostate volume was similar between OSP and PVP group (119 vs 116 cc). Major complications were more common in the OSP group (12.5 vs 1.5%, p < 0.001). At long-term follow-up, Qmax was higher and PVR was lower (p < 0.05) in the OSP group. IPSS score was similar between groups (p = 0.45) but the Qol was better in the OSP group (0.9 vs. 1.6; p < 0.05). There were more re-interventions in the PVP group compared to OSP (15.2 vs. 0%, p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: PVP is a good alternative for prostates > 80 cc particularly for fragile patients as it is associated with a lower complication rate. At long-term follow-up, IPSS was similar between groups, but Qol was better in the OSP group. Patients treated by PVP should be informed that they could require reoperation in 15% of the cases.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Próstata / Prostatectomía / Hiperplasia Prostática / Terapia por Láser Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Int Urol Nephrol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia Pais de publicación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Próstata / Prostatectomía / Hiperplasia Prostática / Terapia por Láser Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Int Urol Nephrol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia Pais de publicación: Países Bajos