Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Application of failure mode and effect analysis in reducing the risk of nosocomial infection].
Zhang, Q P; Wang, X T; Lu, J Q; Shi, F J; Jia, L; Jin, J W; Feng, Q L; Cai, Y.
Afiliación
  • Zhang QP; The First Hospital of Jiaxing, Jiaxing 314000, China.
  • Wang XT; The First Hospital of Jiaxing, Jiaxing 314000, China.
  • Lu JQ; The First Hospital of Jiaxing, Jiaxing 314000, China.
  • Shi FJ; The First Hospital of Jiaxing, Jiaxing 314000, China.
  • Jia L; The First Hospital of Jiaxing, Jiaxing 314000, China.
  • Jin JW; The First Hospital of Jiaxing, Jiaxing 314000, China.
  • Feng QL; The First Hospital of Jiaxing, Jiaxing 314000, China.
  • Cai Y; The First Hospital of Jiaxing, Jiaxing 314000, China.
Article en Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33781034
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To explore the effect of failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) in the management of nosocomial infection, and provide reference for the effective prevention and control of nosocomial infection.

Methods:

Using FMEA to identify, analyze, evaluate and screen out the high-risk events of nosocomial infection in January 2020, from which two hospital level priority improvement projects of hand hygiene compliance and blood-borne occupational exposure were determined. After risk control and intervention measures, the effects before and after improvement were compared.

Results:

Except for the lack of incentive mechanism and insufficient communication between medical and nursing teams, the differences in hand hygiene compliance and blood-borne occupational exposure risk priority coefficients before and after the implementation of FMEA were statistically significant (P<0.05) . After the implementation of FMEA, the hand hygiene compliance was 74.92% (79375/105953) , which was significantly higher than 68.40% (58361/85328) before the implementation of FMEA, and the difference was statistically significant (χ(2)=996.55, P<0.01) . The incidence of blood-borne occupational exposure after the implementation of FMEA was 3.85% (80/2080) , which was lower than the 6.16% (123/1998) before the implementation of FMEA, and the difference was statistically significant (χ(2)=11.49, P<0.01) .

Conclusion:

FMEA has a good effect in nosocomial infection management. It can identify and evaluate the risk of nosocomial infection prospectively, so as to control the risk effectively.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Infección Hospitalaria / Higiene de las Manos / Análisis de Modo y Efecto de Fallas en la Atención de la Salud Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: Zh Revista: Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA OCUPACIONAL Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Infección Hospitalaria / Higiene de las Manos / Análisis de Modo y Efecto de Fallas en la Atención de la Salud Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: Zh Revista: Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA OCUPACIONAL Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China