Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of traditional two-injection dorsal digital block versus transthecal and subcutaneous single-injection digital block: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ito, N; Umazume, M; Ojima, Y; Shibata, D; Ida, Y; Komiya, T; Matsumura, H.
Afiliación
  • Ito N; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
  • Umazume M; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
  • Ojima Y; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
  • Shibata D; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
  • Ida Y; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
  • Komiya T; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
  • Matsumura H; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan. Electronic address: hmatsu-tki@umin.ac.jp.
Hand Surg Rehabil ; 40(4): 369-376, 2021 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33895422
ABSTRACT
Digital nerve block is a common procedure with several techniques, including the traditional digital nerve block, transthecal digital nerve block, and single subcutaneous palmar digital nerve block. This review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of these three methods. A systematic search was performed in the PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases. The risk of bias of the studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing the risk of bias and the Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Non-Randomized Studies. Fourteen prospective randomized controlled studies and one prospective comparative study were included. The three methods of digital block showed similar onset times, durations, injection pain and incidence of incomplete anesthesia. This review confirmed that all three methods of digital block are equally effective. Considering that patients prefer a single injection and the potential risk of complications, the single subcutaneous digital block could be more widely used.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Anestésicos Locales / Bloqueo Nervioso Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Hand Surg Rehabil Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Anestésicos Locales / Bloqueo Nervioso Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Hand Surg Rehabil Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón