Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Falsely high rebound tonometry.
Saffren, Brooke; Price, Jade M; Zhang, Qiang Ed; Hamershock, Rose A; Sharpe, James; Levin, Alex V.
Afiliación
  • Saffren B; Pediatric Ophthalmology and Ocular Genetics, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Price JM; Pediatric Ophthalmology and Ocular Genetics, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Zhang QE; Vickie and Jack Farber Vision Research Center, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Hamershock RA; Vickie and Jack Farber Vision Research Center, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Sharpe J; Pediatric Ophthalmology and Ocular Genetics, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Levin AV; Pediatric Ophthalmology and Ocular Genetics, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Ophthalmology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: alex_levin@urmc.rochester.edu.
J AAPOS ; 25(2): 97.e1-97.e5, 2021 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33901671
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Rebound tonometry (RBT) can be used to measure intraocular pressure (IOP) in children unable to tolerate measurement with applanation tonometry (AT) while awake. RBT readings are often 2-3 mm Hg higher than AT. We have experienced children with a repeatedly higher difference between RBT and AT measurements (≥6 mm Hg). The purpose of this study was to identify demographic and ocular characteristics that contribute to this artifactuous discrepancy.

METHODS:

The medical records of pediatric patients with IOP measured by RBT followed by AT within 6 months without intervening surgery or change in medical management were retrospectively reviewed to identify potential predictors of greater difference between RBT and AT readings.

RESULTS:

A total of 123 eyes of 65 patients were included. In patients with normal IOP (≤24 mm Hg), 18.5% had a ≥6 mm Hg difference between RBT and AT, with RBT being higher. Risk factors for this included presence of persistent fetal vasculature (PFV), increased corneal diameter, and higher initial RBT value (>20). In patients with elevated IOP (>24 mm Hg), 77% had ≥6 mm Hg difference, with larger corneal diameter being the sole predictor. Eyes were less likely to have significant RBT-AT difference if there was corneal opacity or iris abnormalities in eyes with elevated IOP (>24 mm Hg).

CONCLUSIONS:

In some children, RBT readings are ≥ 6 mm Hg higher than AT readings. Caution should be taken when interpreting RBT values in patients with PFV, increased corneal diameter, and higher initial RBT values.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tonometría Ocular / Córnea Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J AAPOS Asunto de la revista: OFTALMOLOGIA / PEDIATRIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tonometría Ocular / Córnea Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J AAPOS Asunto de la revista: OFTALMOLOGIA / PEDIATRIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article