Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Distress-driven impulsivity interacts with cognitive inflexibility to determine addiction-like eating.
Liu, Chang; Rotaru, Kristian; Lee, Rico S C; Tiego, Jeggan; Suo, Chao; Yücel, Murat; Albertella, Lucy.
Afiliación
  • Liu C; 1BrainPark, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health and School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Australia.
  • Rotaru K; 1BrainPark, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health and School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Australia.
  • Lee RSC; 2Monash Business School, Monash University, Australia.
  • Tiego J; 1BrainPark, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health and School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Australia.
  • Suo C; 3Neural Systems & Behaviour Lab, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health and School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Australia.
  • Yücel M; 1BrainPark, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health and School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Australia.
  • Albertella L; 1BrainPark, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health and School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Australia.
J Behav Addict ; 2021 Apr 27.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33909594
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Researchers are only just beginning to understand the neurocognitive drivers of addiction-like eating behaviours, a highly distressing and relatively common condition. Two constructs have been consistently linked to addiction-like eating distress-driven impulsivity and cognitive inflexibility. Despite a large body of addiction research showing that impulsivity-related traits can interact with other risk markers to result in an especially heightened risk for addictive behaviours, no study to date has examined how distress-driven impulsivity interacts with cognitive inflexibility in relation to addiction-like eating behaviours. The current study examines the interactive contribution of distress-driven impulsivity and cognitive inflexibility to addiction-like eating behaviours.

METHOD:

One hundred and thirty-one participants [mean age 21 years (SD = 2.3), 61.8% female] completed the modified Yale Food Addiction Scale, the S-UPPS-P impulsivity scale, and a cognitive flexibility task. A bootstrap method was used to examine the associations between distress-driven impulsivity, cognitive inflexibility, and their interaction with addiction-like eating behaviours.

RESULTS:

There was a significant interaction effect between distress-driven impulsivity and cognitive flexibility (P = 0.03). The follow-up test revealed that higher distress-driven impulsivity was associated with more addiction-like eating behaviours among participants classified as cognitively inflexible only.

CONCLUSION:

The current findings shed light on the mechanisms underlying addiction-like eating behaviours, including how traits and cognition might interact to drive them. The findings also suggest that interventions that directly address distress-driven impulsivity and cognitive inflexibility might be effective in reducing risk for addiction-like eating and related disorders.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Behav Addict Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Behav Addict Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia