Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Challenges in accessing routinely collected data from multiple providers in the UK for primary studies: Managing the morass.
Lugg-Widger, Fiona V; Angel, Lianna; Cannings-John, Rebecca; Hood, Kerenza; Hughes, Kathryn; Moody, Gwenllian; Robling, Michael.
Afiliación
  • Lugg-Widger FV; Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park Way, Cardiff CF14 4YS.
  • Angel L; Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park Way, Cardiff CF14 4YS.
  • Cannings-John R; Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park Way, Cardiff CF14 4YS.
  • Hood K; Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park Way, Cardiff CF14 4YS.
  • Hughes K; Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, School of Medicine, UHW Main Building, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN.
  • Moody G; Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park Way, Cardiff CF14 4YS.
  • Robling M; Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park Way, Cardiff CF14 4YS.
Int J Popul Data Sci ; 3(3): 432, 2018 Sep 21.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34095522
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Researchers are increasingly using routinely collected data in addition to, or instead of, other data collection methods. The UK government continues to invest in research centres to encourage use of these data, and trials and cohort studies utilise data linkage methods in the follow-up of participants. This does not come without its limitations and challenges, such as data access delays.

OBJECTIVE:

This paper outlines the challenges faced by three projects utilising individual-level routinely-collected linked data for the longer-term follow-up of participants.

METHODS:

These studies are varied in design, study population and data providers. One researcher was common to the three studies and collated relevant study correspondence, formal documentary evidence such as data sharing agreements and, where relevant, meeting records to review. Key themes were identified and reviewed by other members of the research teams. Mitigating strategies were identified and discussed with a data provider representative and a broader group of researchers to finalise the recommendations presented.

RESULTS:

The challenges discussed are grouped into five themes Data application process; Project timelines; Dependencies and considerations related to consent; Information Governance; Contractual. In presenting our results descriptively we summarise each case study, identify the main cross-cutting themes and consider the potential for mitigation of challenges.

CONCLUSIONS:

We make recommendations that identify responsibilities for both researchers and data providers for mitigating and managing data access challenges. A continued conversation within the research community and with data providers is needed to continue to enable researchers to access and utilise the wealth of routinely-collected data available. The suggestions made in this paper will help researchers be better prepared to deal with the challenges of applying for data from multiple data providers.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Idioma: En Revista: Int J Popul Data Sci Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Idioma: En Revista: Int J Popul Data Sci Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article