Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Disparities among infertility patients regarding genetic carrier screening, sex selection, and gene editing.
McQueen, Dana B; Warren, Christopher M; Xiao, Alexander H; Shulman, Lee P; Jain, Tarun.
Afiliación
  • McQueen DB; Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
  • Warren CM; Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Xiao AH; Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N Saint Clair, Suite, Chicago, IL, 2310, USA.
  • Shulman LP; Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Jain T; Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. Tarun.Jain@nm.org.
J Assist Reprod Genet ; 38(9): 2319-2325, 2021 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34169402
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the perspectives of infertility patients regarding genetic carrier screening, embryo sex selection, embryo research, and gene editing.

METHODS:

An anonymous 32-question survey was distributed electronically to all patients who seen at a single academic fertility center for at least one visit between June 2018 and September 2019. Survey questions evaluated patient perspectives on genetic carrier screening, embryo sex selection, embryo research, and gene editing.

RESULTS:

There were 1460 survey responses (32.0% response rate). There were significant differences in the proportion of respondents receiving genetic carrier screening between racial groups, 73.1% of White, 45.5% of Black, 49.4% of Hispanic, and 62.8% of Asian respondents. The likelihood of having genetic carrier screening was also significantly influenced by respondent income, insurance status, and religion. Religion significantly influenced the acceptance of embryonic research and embryonic sex selection. While only 8.9% felt that genetically modifying embryos for physical traits should be allowed, 74.1% felt that genetic modification to correct disease should be allowed.

CONCLUSION:

Racial, religious, and socioeconomic factors significantly impacted respondents' likelihood to have genetic carrier screening and views on embryo sex selection, embryo research, and gene editing. These findings highlight the importance of tailoring genetic counseling to the individual, acknowledging individual and cultural differences in agreement with genetic testing and emerging genetic therapies.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Preselección del Sexo / Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud / Disparidades en Atención de Salud / Edición Génica / Asesoramiento Genético / Tamización de Portadores Genéticos / Infertilidad Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Assist Reprod Genet Asunto de la revista: GENETICA / MEDICINA REPRODUTIVA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Preselección del Sexo / Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud / Disparidades en Atención de Salud / Edición Génica / Asesoramiento Genético / Tamización de Portadores Genéticos / Infertilidad Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Assist Reprod Genet Asunto de la revista: GENETICA / MEDICINA REPRODUTIVA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos