Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Combination therapy with paclitaxel and gemcitabine after platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced urothelial cancer.
Harada, Mirii; Tomisaki, Ikko; Minato, Akinori; Onishi, Rei; Terado, Michikazu; Inatomi, Hisato; Fujimoto, Naohiro.
Afiliación
  • Harada M; Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan.
  • Tomisaki I; Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan.
  • Minato A; Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan.
  • Onishi R; Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan.
  • Terado M; Munakata Suikokai General Hospital, Fukutsu, Fukuoka, Japan.
  • Inatomi H; Munakata Suikokai General Hospital, Fukutsu, Fukuoka, Japan.
  • Fujimoto N; Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan.
Int J Urol ; 28(9): 970-974, 2021 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34240471
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of paclitaxel and gemcitabine therapy after platinum-based chemotherapy for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma.

METHODS:

Consecutive patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who received paclitaxel and gemcitabine therapy from December 2003 to March 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The objective response for paclitaxel and gemcitabine therapy, progression-free survival and overall survival, and adverse events were evaluated. The reduction rate among each metastatic site and the associations between the clinical parameters and overall survival or progression-free survival were also assessed.

RESULTS:

We enrolled 58 patients. Complete and partial responses were observed in two (3.4%) and 15 patients (26%), respectively. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 4.3 months (95% confidence interval 2.9-5.2) and 11.5 months (95% confidence interval 7.7-14.8), respectively. The objective response rates of primary site and metastases in lymph nodes, lung, bone, and liver were 6.0%, 37%, 23%, 0%, and 22%, respectively. Poor performance status (≥1), prior use of gemcitabine and the number of metastatic sites (≥2) were significantly associated with poor overall survival. Although three patients discontinued the treatment because of adverse events, there was no therapy-related death.

CONCLUSIONS:

Paclitaxel and gemcitabine therapy seems to be a valid option as a subsequent treatment after platinum-based chemotherapy for urothelial carcinoma, especially in patients with favorable performance status and no prior use of gemcitabine.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria / Carcinoma de Células Transicionales Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Urol Asunto de la revista: UROLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria / Carcinoma de Células Transicionales Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Urol Asunto de la revista: UROLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón
...