Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Fibroscan® probe selection for lean adults.
Stadlbauer, Vanessa; Negrean, Iohanes; Posch, Andreas; Streit, Andrea; Feldbacher, Nicole; Stauber, Rudolf E; Horvath, Angela.
Afiliación
  • Stadlbauer V; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine Medical University of Graz Graz Austria.
  • Negrean I; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine Medical University of Graz Graz Austria.
  • Posch A; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine Medical University of Graz Graz Austria.
  • Streit A; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine Medical University of Graz Graz Austria.
  • Feldbacher N; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine Medical University of Graz Graz Austria.
  • Stauber RE; Area 3 Cardiometabolic Health Center for Biomarker Research in Medicine (CBmed) Graz Austria.
  • Horvath A; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine Medical University of Graz Graz Austria.
JGH Open ; 5(7): 750-753, 2021 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34263068
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

AIM:

Fibroscan® is used to assess fibrosis and steatosis of the liver noninvasively. The company suggests to use the S+-probe in people <18 years with a thoracic circumference (TC) between 45 and 75 cm and the M+-probe in children with a TC >75 cm and adults with a skin-liver capsule distance <2.5 cm. For lean adults with a TC ≤75 cm, no comparative studies have been performed. Furthermore, it is unclear whether lean adults need to be fasted before assessment.

METHODS:

We compared liver stiffness (LS) using Fibroscan® S+- and M+-probes and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP; only available for M+-probe) in healthy volunteers with a TC ≤75 cm compared with those with a TC >75 cm in fasting state and after intake of a standardized light meal (300 kcal).

RESULTS:

We examined 50 volunteers (26 female, 24 ± 3 years). Twenty-two participants were in the TC ≤75 cm group and 28 in TC >75 cm group. LS values with the S+-probe were 15% higher than with the M+-probe in both groups (median difference 0.6 kPa, P < 0.001). Both probes showed good agreement with minimal bias (Spearman correlation r = 0.754, P < 0.001; Interclass Correlation Coefficient 0.843, P < 0.001; Bland-Altman bias 0.6 ± 0.9 kPa, linear regression r 2 = 0.557, P < 0.001). Intake of a light meal had no relevant influence on LS (S+- and M+-probes) or CAP measurements (M+-probe) in both groups.

CONCLUSION:

Lean adults with a TC below 75 cm can be assessed with either the S+-probe or the M+-probe and may take a light meal before assessment.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: JGH Open Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: JGH Open Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article