Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effects of paired associated stimulation with different stimulation position on motor cortex excitability and upper limb motor function in patients with cerebral infarction.
Sui, Yan-Fang; Tong, Liang-Qian; Zhang, Xiang-Yu; Song, Zhen-Hua; Guo, Tie-Cheng.
Afiliación
  • Sui YF; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Affiliated Haikou Hospital of Xiangya Medical College, Central South University, Haikou 570208, China.
  • Tong LQ; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Affiliated Haikou Hospital of Xiangya Medical College, Central South University, Haikou 570208, China.
  • Zhang XY; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The 5th Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 470000, China.
  • Song ZH; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Affiliated Haikou Hospital of Xiangya Medical College, Central South University, Haikou 570208, China. Electronic address: songdfyy@163.com.
  • Guo TC; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China. Electronic address: guotc_dr@163.com.
J Clin Neurosci ; 90: 363-369, 2021 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34275577
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of paired associated stimulation (PAS) with different stimulation position on motor cortex excitability and upper limb motor function in patients with cerebral infarction. METHOD: A total of 120 volunteers with cerebral infarction were randomly divided into four groups. Based on conventional rehabilitation treatment, the PAS stimulation group was given the corresponding position of PAS treatment once a day for 28 consecutive days. The MEP amplitude and RMT of both hemispheres were assessed before and after treatment, and a simple upper limb Function Examination Scale (STEF) score, simplified upper limb Fugl-Meyer score (FMA), and improved Barthel Index (MBI) were used to assess upper limb motor function in the four groups. RESULTS: Following PAS, the MEP amplitude decreased, and the RMT of abductor pollicis brevis (APB) increased on the contralesional side, while the MEP amplitude increased and the RMT of APB decreased on the ipsilesional side. After 28 consecutive days the scores of STEF, FMA, and MBI in the bilateral stimulation group were significantly better than those in the ipsilesional stimulation group and the contralesional stimulation group, but there was no significant difference in the scores of STEF, FMA, and MBI between the ipsilesional stimulation group and the contralesional stimulation group. CONCLUSION: The excitability of the motor cortex can be changed when the contralesional side or the ipsilesional side was given the corresponding PAS stimulation, while the bilateral PAS stimulation can more easily cause a change of excitability of the motor cortex, resulting in better recovery of the upper limb function.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Infarto Cerebral / Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica / Extremidad Superior / Corteza Motora Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Neurosci Asunto de la revista: NEUROLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Infarto Cerebral / Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica / Extremidad Superior / Corteza Motora Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Neurosci Asunto de la revista: NEUROLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China Pais de publicación: Reino Unido