Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mode of delivery of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial of digital and face-to-face therapy.
Kallestad, Håvard; Scott, Jan; Vedaa, Øystein; Lydersen, Stian; Vethe, Daniel; Morken, Gunnar; Stiles, Tore Charles; Sivertsen, Børge; Langsrud, Knut.
Afiliación
  • Kallestad H; Division of Mental Health Care, St. Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
  • Scott J; Department of Mental Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
  • Vedaa Ø; Department of Mental Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
  • Lydersen S; Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom.
  • Vethe D; Department of Mental Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
  • Morken G; Department of Health Promotion, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Bergen, Norway.
  • Stiles TC; Department of Mental Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
  • Sivertsen B; Department of Mental Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
  • Langsrud K; Division of Mental Health Care, St. Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Sleep ; 44(12)2021 12 10.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34291808
ABSTRACT
STUDY

OBJECTIVES:

Digital Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (dCBT-I) has demonstrated efficacy in reducing insomnia severity in self-referred and community samples. It is unknown, however, how dCBT-I compares to individual face-to-face (FtF) CBT-I for individuals referred to clinical secondary services. We undertook a randomized controlled trial to test whether fully automated dCBT-I is non-inferior to individual FtF CBT-I in reducing insomnia severity.

METHODS:

Eligible participants were adult patients with a diagnosis of insomnia disorder recruited from a sleep clinic provided via public mental health services in Norway. The Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) was the primary outcome measure. The non-inferiority margin was defined a priori as 2.0 points on the ISI at week 33.

RESULTS:

Individuals were randomized to FtF CBT-I (n = 52) or dCBT-I (n = 49); mean baseline ISI scores were 18.4 (SD 3.7) and 19.4 (SD 4.1), respectively. At week 33, the mean scores were 8.9 (SD 6.0) and 12.3 (SD 6.9), respectively. There was a significant time effect for both interventions (p < 0.001); and the mean difference in ISI at week 33 was -2.8 (95% CI -4.8 to -0.8; p = 0.007, Cohen's d = 0.7), and -4.6 at week 9 (95% CI -6.6 to -2.7; p < 0.001), Cohen's d = 1.2.

CONCLUSIONS:

At the primary endpoint at week 33, the 95% CI of the estimated treatment difference included the non-inferiority margin and was wholly to the left of zero. Thus, this result is inconclusive regarding the possible inferiority or non-inferiority of dCBT-I over FtF CBT-I, but dCBT-I performed significantly worse than FtF CBT-I. At week 9, dCBT-I was inferior to FtF CBT-I as the 95% CI was fully outside the non-inferiority margin. These findings highlight the need for more clinical research to clarify the optimal application, dissemination, and implementation of dCBT-I. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02044263 Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia Delivered by a Therapist or on the Internet a Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Trial.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual / Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Sleep Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Noruega

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual / Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Sleep Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Noruega
...