Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Metastatic breast cancer: Who benefits from surgery?
Marks, Caitlin E; Thomas, Samantha M; Fayanju, Oluwadamilola M; DiLalla, Gayle; Sammons, Sarah; Hwang, E Shelley; Plichta, Jennifer K.
Afiliación
  • Marks CE; Duke University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Thomas SM; Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA; Biostatistics Shared Resource, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA; Duke University, Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Fayanju OM; Duke University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Durham, NC, USA; Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA; Duke University Medical Center, Department of Population Health Sciences, Durham, NC, USA; Durham VA Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Durham, NC, USA.
  • DiLalla G; Duke University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Durham, NC, USA; Duke Women's Cancer Care Raleigh, Raleigh, NC, USA.
  • Sammons S; Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA; Duke University Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Hwang ES; Duke University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Durham, NC, USA; Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Plichta JK; Duke University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Durham, NC, USA; Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA; Duke University Medical Center, Department of Population Health Sciences, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: jennifer.plichta@duke.edu.
Am J Surg ; 223(1): 81-93, 2022 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34325907
BACKGROUND: We sought to identify characteristics of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients who may benefit most from primary tumor resection. METHODS: Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was used to categorize non-surgical patients with de novo MBC in the NCDB (2010-2015) into 3 groups (I/II/III) based on 3-year overall survival (OS). After bootstrapping (BS), group-level profiles were applied, and the association of surgery with OS was estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: All patients benefitted from surgery (median OS, surgery vs no surgery): 72.7 vs 42.9 months, 47.3 vs 30.4 months, 23.8 vs 14.4 months (all p < 0.001) in BS-groups I, II, and III, respectively. After adjustment, surgery remained associated with improved OS (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.50-0.55). The effect of surgery on OS differed quantitatively across groups. CONCLUSION: Prognostic groups may inform the degree of benefit from surgery, with the greatest benefit seen in those with the most favorable survival.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Selección de Paciente / Mastectomía Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Am J Surg Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Selección de Paciente / Mastectomía Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Am J Surg Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos