Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Necessity of posttreatment surveillance for low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms.
Gupta, Aakash R; Brajcich, Brian C; Yang, Anthony D; Bentrem, David J; Merkow, Ryan P.
Afiliación
  • Gupta AR; Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Department of Surgery, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Brajcich BC; Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Department of Surgery, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Yang AD; Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Bentrem DJ; Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Department of Surgery, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Merkow RP; Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Department of Surgery, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
J Surg Oncol ; 124(7): 1115-1120, 2021 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34333785
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVES:

Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMNs) are generally treated by surgical resection, but posttreatment surveillance protocols are not well-established. The objectives of this study were to characterize posttreatment surveillance and determine the risk of recurrence following surgical resection of LAMN.

METHODS:

Patients who underwent surgical resection of localized LAMNs in an 11-hospital regional healthcare system from 2000 to 2019 were identified. Posttreatment surveillance regimens were characterized, and rates of disease recurrence were evaluated.

RESULTS:

A total of 114 patients with LAMNs were identified. T-category was pTis for 92 patients (80.7%), pT3 for 7 (6.1%), pT4a for 14 (12.3%), and pT4b for 1 (0.9%). Two patients (1.8%) had a positive resection margin. Posttreatment surveillance was performed for 39 (34.2%) patients and consisted of office visits for 32 (82%) patients, computerized tomography imaging for 30 (77%), magnetic resonance imaging for 5 (13%), colonoscopy for 15 (38%), and serum tumor marker measurement for 12 (31%). After a mean follow-up duration of 4.7 years, no patients experienced tumor recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS:

Posttreatment surveillance is common among patients with LAMNs. However, no patients experienced tumor recurrence, regardless of T-category or margin status, suggesting that routine surveillance following surgical resection of LAMN may be unnecessary.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias del Apéndice / Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso / Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente / Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Oncol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias del Apéndice / Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso / Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente / Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Oncol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
...