Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Symptom clusters among cancer survivors: what can machine learning techniques tell us?
Neijenhuijs, Koen I; Peeters, Carel F W; van Weert, Henk; Cuijpers, Pim; Leeuw, Irma Verdonck-de.
Afiliación
  • Neijenhuijs KI; Department of Clinical, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081, BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Peeters CFW; Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van Weert H; Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Boelelaan, 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Cuijpers P; Mathematical & Statistical Methods Group (Biometris), Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
  • Leeuw IV; Department of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, Amsterdam Public Health, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
BMC Med Res Methodol ; 21(1): 166, 2021 08 16.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34399698
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Knowledge regarding symptom clusters may inform targeted interventions. The current study investigated symptom clusters among cancer survivors, using machine learning techniques on a large data set.

METHODS:

Data consisted of self-reports of cancer survivors who used a fully automated online application 'Oncokompas' that supports them in their self-management. This is done by 1) monitoring their symptoms through patient reported outcome measures (PROMs); and 2) providing a personalized overview of supportive care options tailored to their scores, aiming to reduce symptom burden and improve health-related quality of life. In the present study, data on 26 generic symptoms (physical and psychosocial) were used. Results of the PROM of each symptom are presented to the user as a no well-being risk, moderate well-being risk, or high well-being risk score. Data of 1032 cancer survivors were analysed using Hierarchical Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (HDBSCAN) on high risk scores and moderate-to-high risk scores separately.

RESULTS:

When analyzing the high risk scores, seven clusters were extracted one main cluster which contained most frequently occurring physical and psychosocial symptoms, and six subclusters with different combinations of these symptoms. When analyzing moderate-to-high risk scores, three clusters were extracted two main clusters were identified, which separated physical symptoms (and their consequences) and psycho-social symptoms, and one subcluster with only body weight issues.

CONCLUSION:

There appears to be an inherent difference on the co-occurrence of symptoms dependent on symptom severity. Among survivors with high risk scores, the data showed a clustering of more connections between physical and psycho-social symptoms in separate subclusters. Among survivors with moderate-to-high risk scores, we observed less connections in the clustering between physical and psycho-social symptoms.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Supervivientes de Cáncer / Automanejo / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Med Res Methodol Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Supervivientes de Cáncer / Automanejo / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Med Res Methodol Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos
...