Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A prospective, multicenter evaluation of point-of-care ultrasound for appendicitis in the emergency department.
Becker, Brent A; Kaminstein, Daniel; Secko, Michael; Collin, Mark; Kehrl, Thompson; Reardon, Lindsay; Stahlman, Barbara A.
Afiliación
  • Becker BA; Department of Emergency Medicine, Wellspan York Hospital, York, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Kaminstein D; Department of Emergency Medicine, Wellspan York Hospital, York, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Secko M; Department of Emergency Medicine, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
  • Collin M; Department of Emergency Medicine, Wellspan York Hospital, York, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Kehrl T; Department of Emergency Medicine, Wellspan York Hospital, York, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Reardon L; Department of Emergency Medicine, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
  • Stahlman BA; Department of Emergency Medicine, Wellspan York Hospital, York, Pennsylvania, USA.
Acad Emerg Med ; 29(2): 164-173, 2022 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34420255
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The main objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) for the diagnosis of appendicitis in a general emergency department (ED) population as performed by emergency physicians with variable ultrasound experience.

METHODS:

We performed a prospective, multicenter, observational study examining a convenience sample of adult patients with potential appendicitis presenting to the ED between July 2014 and February 2020. Each emergency physician-performed POCUS was interpreted at the bedside and retrospectively by an expert reviewer. Test characteristics were calculated for POCUS and blinded expert interpretation compared to surgical pathology in patients undergoing appendectomy and advanced imaging in patients managed nonoperatively.

RESULTS:

A total of 256 subjects were included in the primary analysis with an overall appendicitis prevalence of 28.1%. For the diagnosis of appendicitis, POCUS demonstrated an overall sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio of 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.74 to 0.92), 0.63 (95% CI = 0.56 to 0.70), 2.29 (95% CI = 1.85 to 2.84), and 0.24 (95% CI = 0.14 to 0.42), respectively. Expert review yielded a lower sensitivity (0.74 [95% CI = 0.62 to 0.83]) with a similar specificity (0.63 [95% CI = 0.56 to 0.70]).

CONCLUSION:

POCUS is moderately accurate for acute appendicitis as performed by emergency physicians with a wide range of ultrasound expertise, but lacks adequate sensitivity and specificity to function as a definitive test in an undifferentiated ED population. Further study is warranted to elucidate the optimal role of integrated POCUS in the general approach to suspected appendicitis.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Apendicitis Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Acad Emerg Med Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA DE EMERGENCIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Apendicitis Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Acad Emerg Med Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA DE EMERGENCIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos