Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Vaginal preparation with povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine before hysterectomy: a propensity score matched analysis.
Skeith, Ashley E; Morgan, Daniel M; Schmidt, Payton C.
Afiliación
  • Skeith AE; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Michigan Medicine University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. Electronic address: skeitha@med.umich.edu.
  • Morgan DM; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Michigan Medicine University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • Schmidt PC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Michigan Medicine University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 225(5): 560.e1-560.e9, 2021 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34473965
BACKGROUND: Antiseptic vaginal preparation is recommended before gynecologic surgery; however, there is a lack of data regarding the effectiveness of different agents. OBJECTIVE: To compare rates of postoperative infectious complications and hospital utilization with preoperative vaginal preparation using povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine before hysterectomy. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent hysterectomy for gynecologic indications at 70 hospitals in a statewide surgical collaborative between January 2017 and December 2019. The primary outcome was postoperative infectious complications (including urinary tract infection, surgical site infections involving superficial, deep, or organ space tissues, or cellulitis) within 30 days of surgery. To adjust for confounding, propensity score matching, 1:1 without replacement and with a caliper of.005 was performed to create cohorts that had vaginal preparation with either povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine and did not differ in observable characteristics. We compared the rates of infectious morbidity and hospital utilization (emergency department visits, readmission, reoperation) in the matched cohorts. RESULTS: In the statewide collaborative, there were 18,184 patients who received povidone-iodine and 3018 who received chlorhexidine. After propensity score matching of 2935 pairs, the povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine groups did not differ in demographics, comorbidities, choice of preoperative antibiotics, benign vs malignant surgical indication, and surgical approach. Povidone-iodine was associated with a lower rate of infectious morbidity (3.0% vs 4.3%; P=.01), urinary tract infection (1.1% vs 1.7%; P=.03) and emergency department visits (7.9% vs 9.7%; P=.01) than with chlorhexidine. There were nonsignificant trends of lower rates of surgical site infection (2.0% vs 2.7%; P=.07) and reoperation (1.6% vs 2.1%; P=.18). CONCLUSION: This propensity score matched analysis provides evidence that povidone-iodine is preferable to chlorhexidine for vaginal preparation before hysterectomy because of lower rates of infectious morbidity and fewer emergency department visits. However, the absolute differences in infectious morbidity rates were approximately 1%, and in the event of an iodine allergy, chlorhexidine appears to be a reasonable alternative.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Povidona Yodada / Cuidados Preoperatorios / Clorhexidina / Histerectomía Vaginal Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Am J Obstet Gynecol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Povidona Yodada / Cuidados Preoperatorios / Clorhexidina / Histerectomía Vaginal Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Am J Obstet Gynecol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos