Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
"Burying" covered coronary stents under drug-eluting stents: A novel approach to ensure long-term stent patency.
Bossard, Matthias; Cioffi, Giacomo Maria; Yildirim, Mustafa; Moccetti, Federico; Wolfrum, Mathias; Attinger, Adrian; Toggweiler, Stefan; Kobza, Richard; Cuculi, Florim.
Afiliación
  • Bossard M; Cardiology Division, Heart Center, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucern, Switzerland. matthias.bossard@luks.ch.
  • Cioffi GM; Cardiology Division, Heart Center, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucern, Switzerland.
  • Yildirim M; Cardiology Division, Heart Center, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucern, Switzerland.
  • Moccetti F; Cardiology Division, Heart Center, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucern, Switzerland.
  • Wolfrum M; Cardiology Division, Heart Center, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucern, Switzerland.
  • Attinger A; Cardiology Division, Heart Center, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucern, Switzerland.
  • Toggweiler S; Cardiology Division, Heart Center, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucern, Switzerland.
  • Kobza R; Cardiology Division, Heart Center, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucern, Switzerland.
  • Cuculi F; Cardiology Division, Heart Center, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucern, Switzerland.
Cardiol J ; 30(2): 196-203, 2023.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34490602
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Covered coronary stent (CS) implantation is associated with a high risk for in-stent restenosis (ISR) and stent thrombosis (ST). We describe the outcomes after overstenting ("burying") CS using contemporary drug-eluting stents (DES).

METHODS:

We analyzed short- and long-term outcomes of consecutive patients who had had a CS implanted, which was consecutively covered ("buried") with a third-generation DES. CSs were primarily post-dilated and then covered with a longer DES overlapping the proximal and distal edges of the CS. To ensure optimal stent expansion and appositions, all lesions were post-dilated using adequately sized non-compliant balloons.

RESULTS:

Between 2015 and 2020, 23 patients (mean age 67 ± 14 years, 74% males) were treated using this novel approach. Reasons for implanting CS included treatment of coronary aneurysms (n = 7; 30%), coronary perforations (n = 13; 57%), and aorto-ostial dissections (n = 3; 13%). All CSs were successfully deployed, and no peri-procedural complications occurred. The median time of follow-up was 24.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 11.7-37.9) months. All patients had a 1-month follow-up (FU) and 19/23 (83%) patients had 12-month FU (FU range 1-60 months). No probable or definite STs occurred, and no cardiovascular deaths were observed. Among patients undergoing angiographic FU (11/23 [48%]), 1/23 showed angiographically significant ISR 6 months post CS implantation.

CONCLUSIONS:

Burying a coronary CS under a DES appears to be a safe and promising strategy to overcome the limitations of the currently available CS devices, including a relatively high risk for target lesion failure due to ISR and ST.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trombosis / Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón / Reestenosis Coronaria / Stents Liberadores de Fármacos / Intervención Coronaria Percutánea Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Cardiol J Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suiza

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trombosis / Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón / Reestenosis Coronaria / Stents Liberadores de Fármacos / Intervención Coronaria Percutánea Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Cardiol J Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suiza