Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
In vitro activity of cefiderocol, cefepime/enmetazobactam, cefepime/zidebactam, eravacycline, omadacycline, and other comparative agents against carbapenem-non-susceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii isolates associated from bloodstream infection in Taiwan between 2018-2020.
Liu, Po-Yu; Ko, Wen-Chien; Lee, Wen-Sen; Lu, Po-Liang; Chen, Yen-Hsu; Cheng, Shu-Hsing; Lu, Min-Chi; Lin, Chi-Ying; Wu, Ting-Shu; Yen, Muh-Yong; Wang, Lih-Shinn; Liu, Chang-Pan; Shao, Pei-Lan; Lee, Yu-Lin; Shi, Zhi-Yuan; Chen, Yao-Shen; Wang, Fu-Der; Tseng, Shu-Hui; Lin, Chao-Nan; Chen, Yu-Hui; Sheng, Wang-Huei; Lee, Chun-Ming; Tang, Hung-Jen; Hsueh, Po-Ren.
Afiliación
  • Liu PY; Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
  • Ko WC; Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
  • Lee WS; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Lu PL; Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
  • Chen YH; Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
  • Cheng SH; Department of Internal Medicine, Taoyuan General Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taoyuan, Taiwan; School of Public Health, College of Public Health and Nutrition, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Lu MC; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
  • Lin CY; Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital Yunlin Branch, Yunlin, Taiwan.
  • Wu TS; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
  • Yen MY; Division of Infectious Diseases, Taipei City Hospital, National Yang-Ming University, School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Wang LS; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, Hualien, Taiwan; Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.
  • Liu CP; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; MacKay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
  • Shao PL; Department of Pediatrics, Hsin-Chu Branch, National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan.
  • Lee YL; Department of Internal Medicine, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan; Institute of Genomics and Bioinformatics, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan.
  • Shi ZY; Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
  • Chen YS; Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Wang FD; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Tseng SH; Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan.
  • Lin CN; Department of Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung, Taiwan; Animal Disease Diagnostic Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung, Taiwan.
  • Chen YH; Infection Control Center, Chi Mei Hospital, Liouying, Taiwan.
  • Sheng WH; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Lee CM; Department of Internal Medicine, St Joseph's Hospital, Yunlin County, Taiwan; MacKay Junior College of Medicine, Nursing, and Management, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Tang HJ; Department of Medicine, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.
  • Hsueh PR; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Laboratory Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwa
J Microbiol Immunol Infect ; 55(5): 888-895, 2022 Oct.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34521591
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/

PURPOSE:

This study aimed to investigate the in vitro susceptibilities of carbapenem-non-susceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CNSPA) and Acinetobacter baumannii (CNSAB) isolates to cefiderocol, novel ß-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) combinations, new tetracycline analogues, and other comparative antibiotics.

METHODS:

In total, 405 non-duplicate bacteremic CNSPA (n = 150) and CNSAB (n = 255) isolates were collected from 16 hospitals in Taiwan between 2018 and 2020. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined using the broth microdilution method, and susceptibilities were interpreted according to the relevant guidelines or in accordance with results of previous studies and non-species-related pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data.

RESULTS:

Among the isolates tested, cefiderocol demonstrated potent in vitro activity against CNSPA (MIC50/90, 0.25/1 mg/L; 100% of isolates were inhibited at ≤4 mg/L) and CNSAB (MIC50/90, 0.5/2 mg/L; 94.9% of isolates were inhibited at ≤4 mg/L) isolates. More than 80% of CNSPA isolates were susceptible to cefiderocol, ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, and amikacin, based on breakpoints established by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Activities of new BLI combinations varied significantly. Tetracycline analogues, including tigecycline (MIC50/90, 1/2 mg/L; 92.5% of CNSAB isolates were inhibited at ≤2 mg/L) and eravacycline (MIC50/90, 0.5/1 mg/L; 99.6% of CNSAB isolates were inhibited at ≤2 mg/L) exhibited more potent in vitro activity against CNSAB than omadacycline (MIC50/90, 4/8 mg/L).

CONCLUSIONS:

The spread of CNSPA and CNSAB poses a major challenge to global health. Significant resistance be developed even before a novel agent becomes commercially available. The development of on-site antimicrobial susceptibility tests for these novel agents is of great clinical importance.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Sepsis / Acinetobacter baumannii Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: J Microbiol Immunol Infect Asunto de la revista: ALERGIA E IMUNOLOGIA / MICROBIOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Taiwán

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Sepsis / Acinetobacter baumannii Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: J Microbiol Immunol Infect Asunto de la revista: ALERGIA E IMUNOLOGIA / MICROBIOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Taiwán