Comparison of in situ preservation techniques for kidneys from donors after circulatory death: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Transl Androl Urol
; 10(8): 3286-3299, 2021 Aug.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-34532253
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:
Several techniques have been developed to reduce the warm ischaemic injury of donation after circulatory death (DCD) organs before procurement. There are scarce data about the in situ preservation techniques for kidney graft outcomes. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the best in situ preservation method for kidney graft outcomes from organs obtained from controlled and uncontrolled DCD.METHODS:
A systematic review of the PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, LILACS and Cochrane databases was conducted. Studies that compare two or more in situ preservation techniques were identified and included. Only studies which provided enough data to calculate odds ratio were eligible for meta-analysis. PROSPERO registration CRD42020179598.RESULTS:
The search strategy yielded 7,121 studies. Ultimately, 14 retrospective studies were included. Because of heterogeneity, the included studies provided weak evidence that normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) is the best in situ preservation technique in terms of delayed graft function (DGF) rates. Regarding primary nonfunction (PNF), we carried out a meta-analysis of 10 studies with a pooled OR of 0.83 (95% CI 0.40-1.71), for the NRP. In regard to DGF, pooled OR for NRP was 0.36 (95% CI 0.25-0.54).CONCLUSIONS:
NRP in the DCD donor could improve kidney graft function and be considered the in situ preservation technique of choice for abdominal organs.
Texto completo:
1
Colección:
01-internacional
Base de datos:
MEDLINE
Tipo de estudio:
Observational_studies
/
Systematic_reviews
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Transl Androl Urol
Año:
2021
Tipo del documento:
Article
País de afiliación:
España