Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Satisfaction, Preference and Injection Habits of Switching to 200 Units/ml Insulin Lispro Pen from 100 Units/ml: A Patient Survey in Germany.
Chen, Jieling; Williams, Paul; Perez-Nieves, Magaly; Piras De Oliveira, Carolina; Spaepen, Erik; Osumili, Beatrice; Poon, Jiat-Ling; Schloot, Nanette C; Thun, Barbara; Blüher, Matthias.
Afiliación
  • Chen J; Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA.
  • Williams P; IQVIA, Real-World Solutions, 17 bis place des Reflets, Tour D2, TSA 64567, 92099, La Defense Cedex, France. paul.williams@iqvia.com.
  • Perez-Nieves M; Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA.
  • Piras De Oliveira C; Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA.
  • Spaepen E; HaaPACS GmbH, Bahnhofstraße 19C, 69198, Schriesheim, Germany.
  • Osumili B; Eli Lilly and Company Limited, 8 Arlington Square West, Downshire Way, Bracknell, RG12 1PU, UK.
  • Poon JL; Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA.
  • Schloot NC; Lilly Deutschland GmbH, Werner-Reimers-Str. 2, 61352, Bad Homburg vor der Höhe, Germany.
  • Thun B; IQVIA Commercial GmbH & Co. OHG, Real-World Solutions, Landshuter Allee 10, 80637, München, Germany.
  • Blüher M; Klinik und Poliklinik für Endokrinologie, Nephrologie, Rheumatologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Diabetes Ther ; 12(11): 2939-2953, 2021 Nov.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34542865
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The study was designed to assess patient satisfaction, preferences and injection habits for patients using insulin lispro 200 units/ml pen (IL200) compared to their previously used disposable 100 units/ml mealtime insulin pen ("MTI-100 pen") in Germany.

METHODS:

A site-based, cross-sectional study involving a self-reported survey and medical record extraction in patients with diabetes currently using IL200 for between 3 and 12 months and had previously used any disposable MTI-100 pen.

RESULTS:

Of 114 patients included, 83.3% were satisfied with IL200 and 3.5% were dissatisfied; 70.2% preferred IL200 over their previous MTI-100 pen and 4.4% preferred their previous MTI-100 pen. The main reasons for IL200 preference were the amount of insulin the pen carries, longer use before discarding, number of non-empty pens discarded, injection volume and frequency replacing pens. Patients discarded (median) 4 IL200 pens per month with 5.3% discarding more than 10 units in their last pen. When insufficient insulin remained to complete a dose, 74.6% injected the remainder and completed with a new pen, 19.3% discarded the pen with remaining insulin, 7.0% saved it for future use and 1.8% left the dose incomplete.

CONCLUSIONS:

Satisfaction and preference for IL200 was high in this sample of patients using IL200 for 3-12 months. Reasons were consistent with IL200 features, explaining the better patient experience and potential resource saving transitioning from a disposable MTI-100 pen.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Idioma: En Revista: Diabetes Ther Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Idioma: En Revista: Diabetes Ther Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos