Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost-Effectiveness of a Proteomic Test for Preterm Birth Prediction.
Grabner, Michael; Burchard, Julja; Nguyen, Chi; Chung, Haechung; Gangan, Nilesh; Boniface, J Jay; Zupancic, John A F; Stanek, Eric.
Afiliación
  • Grabner M; Scientific Affairs, HealthCore, Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA.
  • Burchard J; Research and Development, Sera Prognostics, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Nguyen C; Health Economics and Outcomes Research, HealthCore, Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA.
  • Chung H; Research Operations, HealthCore, Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA.
  • Gangan N; Health Economics and Outcomes Research, HealthCore, Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA.
  • Boniface JJ; Research and Development, Sera Prognostics, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Zupancic JAF; Department of Neonatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Stanek E; Scientific Affairs, HealthCore, Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA.
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res ; 13: 809-820, 2021.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34548799
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Preterm birth (PTB) carries increased risk of short- and long-term health problems as well as higher healthcare costs. Current strategies using clinically accepted maternal risk factors (prior PTB, short cervix) can only identify a minority of singleton PTBs.

OBJECTIVE:

We modeled the cost-effectiveness of a risk-screening-and-treat strategy versus usual care for commercially insured pregnant US women without clinically accepted PTB risk factors. The risk-screening-and-treat strategy included use of a novel PTB prognostic blood test (PreTRM®) in the 19th-20th week of pregnancy, followed by treatment with a combined regimen of multi-component high-intensity-case-management and pharmacologic interventions for the remainder of the pregnancy for women assessed as higher-risk by the test, and usual care in women without higher risk.

METHODS:

We built a cost-effectiveness model using a combined decision-tree/Markov approach and a US payer perspective. We modeled 1-week cycles of pregnancy from week 19 to birth (preterm or term) and assessed costs throughout the pregnancy, and further to 12-months post-delivery in mothers and 30-months in infants. PTB rates and costs were based on >40,000 mothers and infants from the HealthCore Integrated Research Database® with birth events in 2016. Estimates of test performance, treatment effectiveness, and other model inputs were derived from published literature.

RESULTS:

In the base case, the risk-screening-and-treat strategy dominated usual care with an estimated 870 fewer PTBs (20% reduction) and $54 million less in total cost ($863 net savings per pregnant woman). Reductions were projected for neonatal intensive care admissions (10%), overall length-of-stay (7%), and births <32 weeks (33%). Treatment effectiveness had the strongest influence on cost-effectiveness estimates. The risk-screening-and-treat strategy remained dominant in the majority of probabilistic sensitivity analysis simulations and model scenarios.

CONCLUSION:

Use of a novel prognostic test during pregnancy to identify women at risk of PTB combined with evidence-based treatment is estimated to reduce total costs while preventing PTBs and their consequences.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos