Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Avoiding health technology assessment: a global survey of reasons for not using health technology assessment in decision making.
Teerawattananon, Yot; Painter, Chris; Dabak, Saudamini; Ottersen, Trygve; Gopinathan, Unni; Chola, Lumbwe; Chalkidou, Kalipso; Culyer, Anthony J.
Afiliación
  • Teerawattananon Y; Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP), Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
  • Painter C; Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Dabak S; Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP), Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand. chris.p@hitap.net.
  • Ottersen T; Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP), Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
  • Gopinathan U; Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
  • Chola L; Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
  • Chalkidou K; Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
  • Culyer AJ; The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, Geneva, Switzerland.
Cost Eff Resour Alloc ; 19(1): 62, 2021 Sep 22.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34551780
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Despite the documented benefits of using health technology assessments (HTA) to inform resource allocation in health care systems, HTA remains underused, especially in low- and middle-income countries. A survey of global health practitioners was conducted to reveal the top reasons ("excuses") that they had heard from colleagues, policymakers or other stakeholders for not using HTA in their settings.

METHODS:

There were 193 respondents to the survey. Most responses were from individuals in research organisations (37%), ministries of health (27%) and other government agencies (14%). Participants came from Southeast Asia (40%), the Western Pacific (30%), Africa (15%), Europe (7%), the Americas (7%) and the Eastern Mediterranean region (2%).

RESULTS:

The top five reasons encountered by respondents related to lack of data, lack of technical skills for HTA, the technocratic nature of the work, the lack of explicit decision rules and the perception that HTA puts a "price on life".

CONCLUSIONS:

This study aimed to understand and address the top reasons for not using HTA. They fall into three categories (1) misconceptions about HTA; (2) feasibility issues; and (3) values, attitudes and politics. Previous literature has shown that these reasons can be addressed when identified, and even imperfect HTA analyses can provide useful information to a decision-maker.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Health_technology_assessment Idioma: En Revista: Cost Eff Resour Alloc Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Tailandia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Health_technology_assessment Idioma: En Revista: Cost Eff Resour Alloc Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Tailandia