Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Optimizing anticoagulation for patients receiving Impella support.
Beavers, Craig J; DiDomenico, Robert J; Dunn, Steven P; Cox, Jenna; To, Long; Weeks, Phillip; Trujillo, Toby C; Jennings, Douglas L.
Afiliación
  • Beavers CJ; University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
  • DiDomenico RJ; Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Illinois Chicago College of Pharmacy, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Dunn SP; Department of Pharmacy, University of Virginia Heart and Vascular Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
  • Cox J; Department of Pharmacy, Prisma Health Richland Hospital, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
  • To L; Department of Pharmacy, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
  • Weeks P; Department of Pharmacy, Memorial Hermann Health System, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Trujillo TC; University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences/University of Colorado Hospital, Denver, Colorado, USA.
  • Jennings DL; Arnold & Marie Schwartz College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Long Island University, New York, New York, USA.
Pharmacotherapy ; 41(11): 932-942, 2021 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34597429
ABSTRACT
Anticoagulation of patients treated with the Impella percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices is complex and lacks consistency across centers, potentially increasing the risk of complications. In order to optimize safety and efficacy, an expert committee synthesized all available evidence evaluating anticoagulation for patients receiving Impella support in order to provide consensus recommendations for the management of anticoagulation with these devices. The evidence synthesis led to the creation of 42 recommendations to improve anticoagulation management related to the use of the Impella devices. Recommendations address purge solution management, intravenous anticoagulation, monitoring, evaluation and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), and management during combination MCS support. The use of a heparinized, dextrose-containing purge solution is critical for optimal device function, and a bicarbonate-based purge solution may be an alternative in certain situations. Likewise, intravenous (ie, systemic) anticoagulation with heparin is often necessary, although evidence supporting the optimal assay and target range for monitoring the level of anticoagulation is generally lacking. Patients treated with an Impella MCS device may develop HIT, which is more difficult to evaluate and treat in this setting. Lastly, the use of Impella with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or for biventricular support creates additional anticoagulation challenges.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Corazón Auxiliar / Anticoagulantes Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Pharmacotherapy Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Corazón Auxiliar / Anticoagulantes Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Pharmacotherapy Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos