Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A dynamic Markov model to assess the cost-effectiveness of the Kidney Team at Home intervention in The Netherlands.
Redeker, Steef; Ismail, Sohal; Eeren, Hester V; Massey, Emma K; Weimar, Willem; Oppe, Mark; Busschbach, Jan.
Afiliación
  • Redeker S; Erasmus Medical Center, Section of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychiatry, Postal Address, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. s.redeker@erasmusmc.nl.
  • Ismail S; Erasmus Medical Center, Section of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychiatry, Postal Address, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Eeren HV; Erasmus Medical Center, Section of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychiatry, Postal Address, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Massey EK; Erasmus MC, Transplant Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Weimar W; Erasmus MC, Transplant Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Oppe M; Maths in Health, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Busschbach J; Erasmus Medical Center, Section of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychiatry, Postal Address, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur J Health Econ ; 23(4): 597-606, 2022 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34647158
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The Kidney Team at Home program is an educational intervention aimed at patients with chronic kidney disease to assist them in their choice for kidney replacement therapy. Previous studies have shown that the intervention results in an increase in knowledge and communication on kidney replacement therapy, and eventually in an increase in the number of living donor kidney transplantations. The study assesses the cost-effectiveness of the intervention compared to standard care.

METHODS:

A dynamic probabilistic Markov model was used to estimate the monetary and health benefits of the intervention in The Netherlands over 10 years. Data on costs and health-related quality of life were derived from the literature. Transition probabilities, prevalence, and incidence rates were calculated using a large national database. An optimistic and a pessimistic implementation scenario were compared to a base case scenario with standard care.

RESULTS:

In both the optimistic and pessimistic scenario, the intervention is cost-effective and dominant compared to standard care savings were €108,681,985 and €51,770,060 and the benefits were 1382 and 695 QALYs, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

The superior cost-effectiveness of the intervention is caused by the superior health effects and the reduction of costs associated with transplantation, and the relatively small incremental costs of the intervention. The favorable findings of this implementation project resulted in national uptake of the intervention in The Netherlands as of 2021. This is the first time a psychosocial intervention has been implemented as part of standard care in a kidney replacement therapy program worldwide.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Calidad de Vida / Riñón Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Health Econ Asunto de la revista: SAUDE PUBLICA / SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Calidad de Vida / Riñón Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Health Econ Asunto de la revista: SAUDE PUBLICA / SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos