Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Antimicrobial activity of probiotics against oral pathogens around orthodontic mini-implants: an in vitro study.
Lemos, Ivana da Silva; Jassé, Fernanda F de Albuquerque; Suzuki, Selly Sayuri; Alencar, Cristiane de Melo; Fujii, Denise Nami; Zaniboni, Joissi Ferrari; Suzuki, Hideo; Garcez Segundo, Aguinaldo Silva.
Afiliación
  • Lemos IDS; Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Departamento de Ortodontia (Campinas/SP, Brazil).
  • Jassé FFA; Universidade Federal do Pará, Departamento de Dentística Restauradora (Belém/PA, Brazil).
  • Suzuki SS; Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Departamento de Ortodontia (Campinas/SP, Brazil).
  • Alencar CM; Universidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara, Departamento de Odontologia Restauradora (São Paulo/SP, Brazil).
  • Fujii DN; Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Departamento de Ortodontia (Campinas/SP, Brazil).
  • Zaniboni JF; Universidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara, Departamento de Odontologia Restauradora (São Paulo/SP, Brazil).
  • Suzuki H; Universidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara, Departamento de Odontologia Restauradora (São Paulo/SP, Brazil).
  • Garcez Segundo AS; Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Departamento de Microbiologia Bucal, (Campinas/SP, Brazil).
Dental Press J Orthod ; 26(5): e2119350, 2021.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34669825
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the antimicrobial effect of five types of non-industrialized and industrialized probiotics on biofilms formed around orthodontic mini-implants. The null hypothesis tested was there is no difference in the antimicrobial effect between the five types of probiotics tested around orthodontic mini-implants.

METHODS:

For the experiment, 120 mini-implants were immersed for seven days in Staphylococcus aureus solution for biofilm formation, and were subsequently plated in culture medium containing probiotics. The mini-implants were divided into six different groups, according to the probiotic used G1)Lactobacillus casei; G2)Lactobacillus brevis; G3)Lactobacillus rhamnosus; G4) Lactobacillus from fermented milk Yakult®; G5) Lactobacillus from fermented milk Batavito® and G6) without use of probiotic, as negative control. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of all groups were performed using the CFU (colony forming unit) count.

RESULTS:

The study showed that groups G4 and G6 did not present antimicrobial activity, in comparison to groups G1, G2, G3, and G5 (p< 0.05), which demonstrated antimicrobial activity.

CONCLUSION:

The non-commercial probiotic bacteria, Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus rhamnosus, as well as commercially available fermented milk Batavito® presented promising results in the reduction of colonization of mini-implants by S. aureus. Therefore, the null hypothesis was rejected.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Implantes Dentales / Probióticos / Métodos de Anclaje en Ortodoncia / Antiinfecciosos Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: Dental Press J Orthod Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Implantes Dentales / Probióticos / Métodos de Anclaje en Ortodoncia / Antiinfecciosos Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: Dental Press J Orthod Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article