Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Resource planning principles for the radiotherapy process using simulations applied to a longer vacation period use case.
Lindberg, Jesper; Gurjar, Mrugaja; Holmström, Paul; Hallberg, Stefan; Björk-Eriksson, Thomas; Olsson, Caroline E.
Afiliación
  • Lindberg J; Medical Radiation Sciences, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Gurjar M; Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Holmström P; Regional Cancer Centre West, Western Sweden Healthcare Region, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Hallberg S; Medical Radiation Sciences, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Björk-Eriksson T; Medical Radiation Sciences, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Olsson CE; Regional Cancer Centre West, Western Sweden Healthcare Region, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34703909
PURPOSE: Radiotherapy (RT) resources need to be used wisely to balance workload and patient throughput. There are no known strategies on how to plan resource use around longer vacation periods to avoid patient waiting times. We created a simulation model over the RT workflow to evaluate different scenarios for this purpose. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The simulation model mimics a large modern RT department in Sweden. It was based on real data on patient referral patterns and resource use extracted from clinical systems (3666 treatment courses). Workshops with managers and staff were held to investigate nine different scenarios for the summer vacation period including one scenario to validate the model. Different capacity reductions, vacation period lengths and timing of the vacation periods between the preparatory part of the RT workflow and the treatment part were evaluated. RESULTS: For an eight-week period, resource utilization was predicted to be high both before and after the vacation period regardless of timing. However, more patients would be waiting with completed preparations with simultaneous vacation periods than when the preparatory part started one-two weeks prior to the treatment part. With shorter vacation periods, treatment would require overtime during the vacation period with higher levels of patients waiting compared to an eight-week scenario. CONCLUSIONS: Our proposed strategy aided managers to identify a preferred scenario for the summer vacation period with the preparatory part starting one-two weeks prior to the treatment part for an eight-week vacation period. This can help other RT departments to plan for similar situations.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suecia Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suecia Pais de publicación: Reino Unido