Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnosis and Treatment for Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines and Consensus Statements.
Chen, Ya-Xin; Liang, Ning; Li, Xiao-Ling; Yang, Si-Hong; Wang, Yan-Ping; Shi, Nan-Nan.
Afiliación
  • Chen YX; Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
  • Liang N; Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
  • Li XL; First School of Clinical Medicine, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Shaanxi, China.
  • Yang SH; Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
  • Wang YP; Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
  • Shi NN; Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Front Neurol ; 12: 719849, 2021.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34712197
Background: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is an important stage between the normal cognitive decline of aging and dementia. The aim of this study was to compare and harmonize the recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of MCI based on current clinical practice guidelines. Methods: We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database, and Chinese Biological Medicine Database from their inception date to April 24, 2021 to identify all published guidelines on MCI. The qualities of the eligible guidelines were appraised by two reviewers using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument. Results: Thirteen guidance documents (four guidelines and nine consensus statements) with specific recommendations were included. Nine guidelines and consensus statements covered the screening and diagnosis of MCI. The evaluation of the documents showed that neuropsychological testing and biomarker assessments were the most common recommendations for the diagnosis of MCI. Nine of the 13 guidance documents covered the treatment and management of MCI. The recommendations for the treatment and management were classified into four categories, namely: intervention for risk reduction, pharmacologic interventions, non-pharmacologic interventions, and counseling. Regarding pharmacological interventions, three guidelines recommend no pharmacologic intervention. The use of cholinesterase inhibitors for MCI is contraindicated in three guidance documents, whereas one proposes that cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine should be deprescribed. EHb761®, Chinese herbal decoctions, and Chinese traditional patent medicine are recommended in two documents. A total of seven guidance documents recommend non-pharmacological interventions, including physical activity interventions, cognitive interventions, dietary and nutritional interventions, and acupuncture. Conclusion: An updated search for possible evidence on the diagnosis and treatment of MCI is needed. Potentially effective diagnoses and treatments, either conventional or complementary, and alternative therapies should be highly valued and addressed in correlation with the supporting evidence.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Front Neurol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China Pais de publicación: Suiza

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Front Neurol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China Pais de publicación: Suiza