Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Clinical Impact of Unilateral Versus Bilateral Invasion Into the Seminal Vesicle in Patients With Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy.
Numbere, Numbereye; Teramoto, Yuki; Gurung, Pratik M S; Wang, Ying; Yang, Zhiming; Miyamoto, Hiroshi.
Afiliación
  • Numbere N; From the Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine (Numbere, Teramoto, Wang, Yang, Miyamoto), University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
  • Teramoto Y; From the Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine (Numbere, Teramoto, Wang, Yang, Miyamoto), University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
  • Gurung PMS; From the James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute (Teramoto, Miyamoto), University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
  • Wang Y; From the Department of Urology (Gurung, Miyamoto), University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
  • Yang Z; From the Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine (Numbere, Teramoto, Wang, Yang, Miyamoto), University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
  • Miyamoto H; From the Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine (Numbere, Teramoto, Wang, Yang, Miyamoto), University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
Arch Pathol Lab Med ; 146(7): 855-861, 2022 07 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34752605
ABSTRACT
CONTEXT.­ Seminal vesicle involvement by prostate cancer has generally been considered as a key prognosticator. OBJECTIVE.­ To assess the clinical significance of unilateral (Uni) versus bilateral (Bil) seminal vesicle invasion (SVI). DESIGN.­ We compared radical prostatectomy findings and long-term oncologic outcomes in 248 patients showing Uni-SVI (n = 139) versus Bil-SVI (n = 109). RESULTS.­ Tumor grade was significantly higher in Bil-SVI cases than in Uni-SVI cases. Additionally, Bil-SVI was significantly associated with a higher incidence of lymphovascular invasion, lymph node metastasis, or positive surgical margin, and larger estimated tumor volume. When the histopathologic features at SVI foci were compared, Grade Group (GG) 3-5/4-5/5 and cribriform morphology were significantly more often seen in Bil-SVI. Outcome analysis revealed that patients with Bil-SVI had a significantly higher risk of disease progression (P < .001) than patients with Uni-SVI. Significantly worse progression-free survival in patients with Bil-SVI was also observed in all subgroups examined, including those with no immediate adjuvant therapy (IAT) (n = 139; P = .01), IAT (n = 109; P = .001), pN0 disease (n = 153; P = .002), or pN1 disease (n = 93; P = .006). In multivariate analysis, Bil-SVI (versus Uni-SVI) showed significance for progression in the entire (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.83, P = .01), IAT (HR = 2.90, P = .006), and pN0 (HR = 2.05, P = .01) cohorts. Meanwhile, tumor grade at SVI (eg, GG4, GG5), as an independent predictor, was significantly associated with patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS.­ Bil-SVI was found to be strongly associated with worse histopathologic features on radical prostatectomy and poorer prognosis. Pathologists may thus need to report Uni-SVI versus Bil-SVI, along with other histopathologic findings, such as Gleason score, at SVI in prostatectomy specimens.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata / Vesículas Seminales Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Arch Pathol Lab Med Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata / Vesículas Seminales Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Arch Pathol Lab Med Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article