Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the prevalence of depression between people with and without Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes.
Farooqi, Aaisha; Gillies, Clare; Sathanapally, Harini; Abner, Sophia; Seidu, Sam; Davies, Melanie J; Polonsky, William H; Khunti, Kamlesh.
Afiliación
  • Farooqi A; Department of Psychology, Birmingham City University, UK. Electronic address: aaisha.farooqi@bcu.ac.uk.
  • Gillies C; Leicester Real World Evidence Unit, University of Leicester, UK.
  • Sathanapally H; Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, UK.
  • Abner S; Leicester Real World Evidence Unit, University of Leicester, UK.
  • Seidu S; Leicester Real World Evidence Unit, University of Leicester, UK; Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, UK.
  • Davies MJ; Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, UK; NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester General Hospital, UK.
  • Polonsky WH; Behavioral Diabetes Institute, University of California, San Diego, USA.
  • Khunti K; Leicester Real World Evidence Unit, University of Leicester, UK; Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, UK.
Prim Care Diabetes ; 16(1): 1-10, 2022 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34810141
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

Diabetes can significantly impact quality of life and mental health. However, inconsistencies have been reported in the prevalence of depression in those with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes, and those without. Systematic reviews also included studies without adequate control subjects. We update existing literature, by comparing depression prevalence between individuals with and without Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes.

METHODS:

A systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and PSYCHINFO, from January 1985 to August 2021. Studies were excluded if they failed to have an adequate control group, specified type of diabetes, or reported depression prevalence by type of diabetes.

RESULTS:

44 studies were selected for inclusion. The prevalence of depression was significantly higher in people with Type 1 (22% vs 13%, OR = 2.10 (95% CI 1.23, 3.52)), or Type 2 diabetes (19% vs 11%, OR = 1.76 (1.55, 2.01)) compared to those without diabetes. There was no association between study effect size and mean age or gender. Findings did not significantly differ between methods of depression assessment. Prevalence of depression in people with diabetes was higher in studies carried out in specialist care (36%, OR = 3.14 (2.12, 4.63)) compared to those in community or primary care (12%, OR = 1.51 (1.35, 1.70) and in low- and middle-income countries (OR = 2.58 (1.91, 3.50) compared to countries with high income economies (OR = 1.59 (1.39, 1.82)).

CONCLUSIONS:

Depression prevalence remains significant in those with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Effective chronic disease management in people with diabetes is important, particularly screening and managing depression and diabetes distress in specialist care settings.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Prim Care Diabetes Asunto de la revista: ENDOCRINOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Prim Care Diabetes Asunto de la revista: ENDOCRINOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article