Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Anterior-Lateral Versus Anterior-Posterior Electrode Position for Cardioverting Atrial Fibrillation.
Schmidt, Anders Sjørslev; Lauridsen, Kasper Glerup; Møller, Dorthe Svenstrup; Christensen, Per Dahl; Dodt, Karen Kaae; Rickers, Hans; Løfgren, Bo; Albertsen, Andi Eie.
Afiliación
  • Schmidt AS; Department of Internal Medicine, Randers Regional Hospital, Denmark (A.S.S., K.G.L., H.R., B.L.).
  • Lauridsen KG; Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark (A.S.S., K.G.L., B.L.).
  • Møller DS; Department of Internal Medicine, Randers Regional Hospital, Denmark (A.S.S., K.G.L., H.R., B.L.).
  • Christensen PD; Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark (A.S.S., K.G.L., B.L.).
  • Dodt KK; Department of Cardiology, Viborg Regional Hospital, Denmark (D.S.M., P.D.C., A.E.A.).
  • Rickers H; Department of Cardiology, Viborg Regional Hospital, Denmark (D.S.M., P.D.C., A.E.A.).
  • Løfgren B; Department of Internal Medicine, Horsens Regional Hospital, Denmark (K.K.D.).
  • Albertsen AE; Department of Internal Medicine, Randers Regional Hospital, Denmark (A.S.S., K.G.L., H.R., B.L.).
Circulation ; 144(25): 1995-2003, 2021 12 21.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34814700
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Smaller randomized studies have reported conflicting results regarding the optimal electrode position for cardioverting atrial fibrillation. However, anterior-posterior electrode positioning is widely used as a standard and believed to be superior to anterior-lateral electrode positioning. Therefore, we aimed to compare anterior-lateral and anterior-posterior electrode positioning for cardioverting atrial fibrillation in a multicenter randomized trial.

METHODS:

In this multicenter, investigator-initiated, open-label trial, we randomly assigned patients with atrial fibrillation scheduled for elective cardioversion to either anterior-lateral or anterior-posterior electrode positioning. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients in sinus rhythm after the first shock. The secondary outcome was the proportion of patients in sinus rhythm after up to 4 shocks escalating to maximum energy. Safety outcomes were any cases of arrhythmia during or after cardioversion, skin redness, and patient-reported periprocedural pain.

RESULTS:

We randomized 468 patients. The primary outcome occurred in 126 patients (54%) assigned to the anterior-lateral electrode position and in 77 patients (33%) assigned to the anterior-posterior electrode position (risk difference, 22 percentage points [95% CI, 13-30]; P<0.001). The number of patients in sinus rhythm after the final cardioversion shock was 216 (93%) assigned to anterior-lateral electrode positioning and 200 (85%) assigned to anterior-posterior electrode positioning (risk difference, 7 percentage points [95% CI, 2-12]). There were no significant differences between groups in any safety outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS:

Anterior-lateral electrode positioning was more effective than anterior-posterior electrode positioning for biphasic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. There were no significant differences in any safety outcome. Registration URL https//www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier NCT03817372.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fibrilación Atrial / Cardioversión Eléctrica / Electrodos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Circulation Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fibrilación Atrial / Cardioversión Eléctrica / Electrodos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Circulation Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article